Youth and some adults have photoscreening refractions and hand-held auto refraction before cycloplegia refraction during new and follow up eye examinations. Vector math is applied to each refraction to determine how closely the hand-held "dry" devices match actual refraction.
A closeness-of-fit algorithm utilizing vector transformations of astigmatism is designed and applied to 50-years of clinical international refractive experience. As a part of new and follow up comprehensive eye examinations, patients and parents consented to confirm the cycloplegic refraction to other portable refractive tools. The ability of photoscreeners "2WIN" ("Adaptica," Padova italy), "PlusoptiX A12" (Nuremberg, Germany) and "Retinomax" (Righton, Tokyo, Japan) to match actual refraction is assessed utilizing the new algorithm. This algorithm could then be applied to batches of donated spectacles distend by charitable organizations worldwide if portable auto refracting devices are employed.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
708
non-cycloplegia refraction by Adaptica "2WIN"
non-cycloplegic refraction by "Plusoptix A12" photoscreener
non-cycloplegic refraction by "Retinomax K+" auto refractor
Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Refractive Accuracy
spherical equivalent
Time frame: 1 day
Refractive Accuracy
Vector transform J0 and J45 astigmatism
Time frame: 1 day
Refractive Accuracy
Spectacle comparison score (Percent similarity combined sphere-cylinder)
Time frame: 1 day
Impact of age
Spectacle similarity score striated by age relative to patient's ability to accommodate
Time frame: 1 day
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.