Trocar site hernia is a specific complication of laparoscopic surgery. The increasingly frequent use of the laparoscopic approach has resulted in an increase in the number of hernias, mainly at the umbilical area. The appearance of a trocar site hernia can cause complications in the short and long term to the patient who may end up needing a reoperation. In this study we want to compare the supraumbilical versus the infraumbilical location of the laparoscopy entry trocar, in terms of incisional hernia incidence.
Trocar site hernias have been considered as an underestimated problem by some surgeons. It's incidence varies in the literature between studies, which may be related to an insufficient diagnosis due to poor clinical manifestation and / or the lack of long-term follow-up of patients in some studies. There are many risk factors that have been related to the trocar site hernia development. On one side, the patient clinical factors as the age, presence of obesity, diabetes mellitus or the smoking habits. On the other side, some risk factors related to the surgical technique have been described, as the entry technique, the size and the locations of the trocars, the fascial closure, the duration of the surgery or the infection of the surgical wound. Regarding the location of the trocars, it seems that the middle line has more risk of incisional hernia than the lateral areas in the abdomen. However, the trocar locations out of the middle line is not always possible, especially in certain surgeries as the laparoscopic cholecystectomy where it can be necessary an expansion of the incision for removing the specimen. In the concrete case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the belly is usually the most popular region for placing the first trocar. However, there is not much evidence about the influence of the most popular locations of the umbilical trocar incision (supra or infraumbilical) in the development of incisional hernias. In the middle line, the infraumbilical region presents a great ability to adapt to pressure changes, as it physiologically occurs during the pregnancy. On the other side, while the primary hernias in the supraumbilical and umbilical region are common, these are not produced in the infraumbilical region. Besides, in anatomical studies of the linea alba, a higher thickness of the fibres in the infraumbilical region has been observed, along with a different spatial arrangement, predominating the transverse fibres in the infraumbilical region and the oblique ones in the supraumbilical region. Therefore, we hypothesize whether the infraumbilical location of the trocar in the midline, theoretically a more protected region, can reduce the incidence of trocar site hernia in our patients. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of the Hasson trocar site hernia between the supra and infraumbilical locations a year after surgery, in high risk patients for trocar site hernia subjected to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
130
Infraumbilical Hasson trocar incision
Supraumbilical Hasson trocar incision
La Mancha Centro General Hospital
Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain
Tomelloso General Hospital
Tomelloso, Ciudad Real, Spain
Valdepeñas General Hospital
Valdepeñas, Ciudad Real, Spain
Trocar site hernia
Number of patients presenting a trocar site hernia, at the periumbilical incision, one year after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Time frame: One year
Umbilical wound complications different from Trocar Site Hernia
Infection, seroma or ecchymosis at the umbilical wound
Time frame: 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days, 6 months and 1 year.
Non-umbilical wounds complications
Hernia, infection, seroma, ecchymosis or evisceration at non-umbilical wounds.
Time frame: 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days, 6 months and 1 year.
Other complications
Other complications not related to the surgical wound
Time frame: 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days, 6 months and 1 year.
Surgical time
Measured in minutes from the first incision until the complete closure of the last surgical wound
Time frame: Day 0
Conversion
Conversion rate to open surgery (yes/no).
Time frame: Day 0
Hospital stay
Measured in hours from the surgery to the patient discharge.
Time frame: Day 0
Postoperative pain
Measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with a punctuation between 0 (no pain) and 10 (the worst conceivable pain).
Time frame: 24 hours and 7 days after surgery.
Perceived Quality of Life
Measured using the SF-36 questionnaire,
Time frame: baseline, one month and a year after surgery.
Aesthetic result
Measured using the Visual Analogue Scale, with a punctuation between 0 (not at all satisfied) and 10 (maximum satisfaction).
Time frame: Six months and a year of the surgery.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.