Primary Objective: • To compare the immunogenicity of Gan \& Lee Insulin Lispro Injection and EU-authorized Humalog following treatment in adult subjects with T1DM Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate the safety of Gan \& Lee Insulin Lispro Injection in comparison with that of EU authorized Humalog following treatment in adult subjects with T1DM * To evaluate the efficacy of Gan \& Lee Insulin Lispro Injection in comparison with that of EU authorized Humalog following treatment in adult subjects with T1DM
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Route of administration: subcutaneous injection
Route of administration: subcutaneous injection
Treatment developed AIAs or important increase in AIA titers
The percentage of subjects in each treatment group who develop treatment induced AIAs, defined as newly confirmed positive AIA development or important (at least a 4-fold) increase in titers after baseline and up to visit Week 26.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 26
Percentage of subjects with negative AIA at baseline who develop positive AIA after baseline
The percentage of subjects in each treatment group with negative AIA at baseline who develop confirmed positive AIA after baseline and up to visit Week 26.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 26
Percentage of subjects with important increase in titers
The percentage of subjects in each treatment group with confirmed positive AIA at baseline and at least a 4-fold increase in titers after baseline and up to visit Week 26.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 26
Mean change from baseline in AIA titers
The mean change from baseline in each treatment group in AIA titers after baseline and up to visit Week 26.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 26
Percentage of subjects with confirmed positive AIA who develop anti-insulin NAbs
The percentage of subjects in each treatment group with confirmed positive AIA after baseline and up to visit Week 26 who develop any anti-insulin NAbs after baseline and up to visit Week 26.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 26
Percentage of subjects with positive AIA after baseline
The percentage of subjects in each treatment group with confirmed positive AIA after baseline and up to visit Week 26.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Advanced Research Center
Anaheim, California, United States
Valley Research
Fresno, California, United States
Angel City Research, Inc.
Los Angeles, California, United States
California Medical Research Association
Northridge, California, United States
Mills-Peninsula Health Services
San Mateo, California, United States
Care Access Research - Santa Clarita
Santa Clarita, California, United States
Metabolic Institute of America
Tarzana, California, United States
University of Colorado School of Medicine
Aurora, Colorado, United States
IMMUNOe International Research Centers - Longmont
Longmont, Colorado, United States
Chase Medical Research of Greater New Haven
Hamden, Connecticut, United States
...and 97 more locations
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 26
Incidence and severity of all treatment-emergent adverse events
The incidence and severity of all treatment-emergent adverse events and the following subgroups: Adverse events of special interest. Serious adverse events, including fatal events. Adverse events leading to termination of the study treatment and/or early withdrawal from the study. Treatment-related adverse events. IP device-related adverse events. Injection site reactions. The incidence of clinically significant laboratory abnormalities. The incidence of clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination and vital signs.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 26
Change from baseline in HbA1c at visit Week 26
Change from baseline in HbA1c at visit Week 26 in each treatment group.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 26
Percentage of subjects who achieve an HbA1c of ≤ 7.0% at visit Week 26
The number and percentage of subjects who achieve an HbA1c of ≤ 7.0% at visit Week 26 in each treatment group.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 26