Objectives The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the SREIA parent training program for families of children with ASD aged three to six years in mainland China. The study will be conducted within the context of routine service provision and assess the effectiveness of SREIA in reducing child behavioral problems as measured by the Externalizing scale of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) for Ages 1.5-5, in comparison to a waitlist control group. Secondary objectives include examining the effectiveness of the SREIA program in reducing ASD symptoms and improving parental and familial outcomes including parental knowledge of ASD and ABA techniques, parenting styles, parental mental health (including stress, anxiety and depression), and family functioning. A process evaluation will be conducted alongside the quasi-experimental trial, the objectives of which are to 1) describe the implementation aspects of the programs with regard to participant involvement, program acceptability, delivery, and sustainability; 2) explore predictors of participant involvement; and 3) examine potential relations between implementation aspects and treatment effects. Background ASD is associated with elevated levels of child emotional and behavior disturbance, which impair child daily functioning and impose challenges to parenting. The SREIA programme is a group-based parent training in China, that has been delivered since 1993 and reached over 10,000 families. However, there is an absence of scientific evaluations of programme effectiveness. This study aims to fill this evidence gap, and the findings will be used to inform future modification, replication, and dissemination of the programme in other parts of China. This study will also contribute to the literature on the effectiveness of parent training programmes for ASD and for families living in low- and middle-income countries. Methods A quasi-experimental design with a mixed-methods approach will be used, involving two consecutive waves of delivery of the SREIA programme. Parent participants will complete demographic and outcome questionnaires at baseline, immediate post-intervention, and 1- or 1.5-year post-intervention (conditional to funding). The implementation components will be assessed by collecting attendance and engagement registry data, facilitators filling out fidelity checklists, research staff observing programme sessions, and parents answering a satisfaction questionnaire. After the programme, some parents, facilitators, and NGO (non-governmental organisation) managers will be invited to take part in qualitative interviews or focus group discussions so as to explore their views about the programme, and to better understand the quantitative data obtained.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
111
The SREIA program is grounded in applied behavior analysis and developmental theories. It aims to reduce child behavioral problems and promote child development by improving parental attitudes and parenting styles. The program targets parent-child dyads from families of children with ASD aged between three and six years. It is delivered five days a week for 11 weeks. Fourteen two-hour lectures on weekly themes (such as knowledge of ASD, parent-child interaction, and behavior management techniques) are offered throughout the 11 weeks and attended by all participating parents. For the remaining time, additional training in ABA principles and practice are tailored for the different functioning groups. The program offers a combination of individual counselling and group sessions, as well as a mixture of didactic and interactive delivery modes. All sessions are delivered in person. Some sessions are only for parents and others are participated in by both parent and child.
Beijing Stars and Rain Education Institute for Autism
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Change in frequency of child ehavioral problems
Child behavioral problems will be assessed using the Externalizing scale of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) for Ages 1.5-5. The Externalizing scale measures child attention problems and aggressive behaviors using 24 items rated by parents based on child performance during the previous two months with a 3-point -type scale. The study will use the CBCL 1.5-5 for all families whose children will be between three to six years old. Lower scores suggest fewer behavioral problems. Research has shown sufficient test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent validity, and cross-cultural validity of CBCL 2-3 and CBCL 4-18 in China, but the evidence regarding the validity and reliability of this new version of CBCL 1.5-5 is currently limited. However, the CBCL 1.5-5 has shown good factorial validity among Chinese girls adopted into North American families; it has also demonstrated good internal validity with children with ASD.
Time frame: Differences between groups within 1 month after the end of intervention
Change in frequency of ASD symptoms
ASD symptoms will be assessed using the Chinese version of the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC), which comprise four subscales to measure child speech/language/communication, sociability, sensory/cognitive awareness, and health/physical/behavior. The scale has 77 items that are scored by parents. The health/physical/behavior subscale is rated using a 0 (not a problem)-to-3 (serious problem) point scale, whereas the other three subscales are rated using a 0 (not true)-to-2 (very true) point scale. Higher scores represent more ASD symptoms.
Time frame: Differences between groups within 1 month after the end of intervention
Change in frequency of parenting style: over-reactivity
Over-reactivity parenting style will be measured using the Over-Reactivity subscale (5 items) of the Arnold-O'Leary Parenting Scale (PS). The PS assesses dysfunctional discipline practices reported by parents using a 7-point Likert-type scale. Higher scores indicate more dysfunctional parenting practices.
Time frame: Differences between groups within 1 month after the end of intervention
Change in frequency of parenting style: supportive behaviors
Supportive parenting style will be measured using the Supporting Positive Behavior subscale (7 items) of the Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC). The PARYC Supporting Positive Behavior subscale is rated by parents from 1 to 7 regarding the frequency with which they engaged in such parenting strategies during the last month. Higher scores represent more positive and proactive parenting practices. Higher scores indicate more supportive parenting practices.
Time frame: Differences between groups within 1 month after the end of intervention
Change in frequency of parental mental health symptoms
Parental mental health will be assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 items (DASS-21), which consists of three self-report subscales (depression, anxiety, and stress) with each having 7 items that are rated from 0 (not apply to me) to 3 (apply to me very much or most of the time). Higher scores indicate a worse emotional state.
Time frame: Differences between groups within 1 month after the end of intervention
Change in family function
Family function will be assessed using the Chinese version of the Family APGAR scale, which consists of 5 items that are rated from 0 (never) to 2 (often) to examine the five functional components of adaptability, partnership, growth, affection, and resolve. Higher scores indicate that parents are more satisfied with their relationships with other family members.
Time frame: Differences between groups within 1 month after the end of intervention
Change in parental knowledge
Parental knowledge will be measured using of a questionnaire designed for the SREIA evaluation to assess parental understanding of ASD and child behaviors.
Time frame: Differences between groups within 1 month after the end of intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.