Disease activity and response to therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) can be assessed by a range of endpoints including symptoms, endoscopic mucosal activity, histological disease activity, and biomarkers. This study aims to determine the optimal treatment target, which is a research priority for the management of UC both to inform clinical practice and to help inform regulatory endpoints and targets for drug development. Participants with active UC will be randomized in a 5:4:1 (initially 2:3:5) ratio to 1 of 3 groups, each with a different treatment target. Treatment targets will be defined as: * Group 1: corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission * Group 2: corticosteroid-free endoscopic + symptomatic remission * Group 3: corticosteroid-free histological + endoscopic + symptomatic remission An interim analysis was performed to assess the proportion of subjects that reached their assigned treatment target after 50 subjects in each group had reached the first 32-week assessment. The interim analysis and projections made based on target achievement rates for all subjects included in the interim analysis resulted in a recommendation to adjust the randomization ratio from 2:3:5 to 5:4:1 for Groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively as of May 5th, 2023. This change was necessary in order to complete the study with approximately 100 subjects achieving treatment target within each group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
672
Participants who are not on UC treatment at screening (or who have only used topical therapy) will require standard first-line therapy. Either oral 5-ASA and/or immunosuppressive (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate), with optional oral corticosteroid up to a maximum of 30 mg or prednisone or equivalent, will be initiated.
Participants who are taking oral 5-ASA, immunosuppressive (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate), and/or oral corticosteroid at screening will follow the treatment algorithm. Participants will change to intravenous vedolizumab therapy. Participants will be assessed to determine it remission target is achieved at weeks 16, 32 and 48. If the participant has achieved their treatment target, they will continue that line of therapy. If the participant has not achieved their treatment target, treatment and/or dose escalation will be administered according to the algorithm.
Participants who are taking a TNFα antagonist (infliximab, golimumab, or adalimumab), tofacitinib, or ustekinumab therapy at screening will follow the treatment algorithm. Participants will change to intravenous vedolizumab therapy. Participants will be assessed to determine it remission target is achieved at weeks 16, 32 and 48. If the participant has achieved their treatment target, they will continue that line of therapy. If the participant has not achieved their treatment target, treatment and/or dose escalation will be administered according to the algorithm.
St. Joseph Mercy Hospital/Huron Gastroenterology Associates
Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, United States
New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Digestive Health Partners - Asheville Gastroenterology Associate
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
Atrium Health (Carolinas HealthCare)
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Difference in Time to UC-related Complication Between Treatment Target Groups 1 and 3
Time to UC-related complication starting when a participant reaches their assigned treatment target, compared between treatment target groups 1 and 3.
Time frame: From date of treatment target achievement until date of first UC-related complication until end of study (Week 96), whichever came first
Difference in Time to UC-related Complication Compared Between Treatment Target Groups 1 and 2.
Time to UC-related complication starting when a participant reaches their assigned treatment target, compared between treatment target groups 1 and 2.
Time frame: From date of treatment target achievement until date of first UC-related complication until end of study (Week 96), whichever came first
Difference in Time to UC-related Complication Compared Between Treatment Target Groups 2 and 3.
Time to UC-related complication starting when a participant reaches their assigned treatment target, compared between treatment target groups 2 and 3.
Time frame: From date of treatment target achievement until date of first UC-related complication until end of study (Week 96), whichever came first
Difference in time to UC-related complication compared between subgroups
Time to UC-related complication compared between subgroups on and off corticosteroids at the time of achieving other relevant components of the treatment target.
Time frame: From date of treatment target achievement until date of first UC-related complication until end of study (Week 96), whichever came first
Difference in Time to Achieve Treatment Target
Time taken to achieve the respective targets among the randomized groups. Time will be censored for subjects who do not achieve their assigned target by Week 48.
Time frame: up to 96 weeks
Fecal Calprotectin Levels
Change in fecal calprotectin levels from baseline to Weeks 8, 16, 32, 48, and 96.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 8, 16, 32, 48, and 96.
C-Reactive Protein Concentration
Change in C-Reactive Protein concentration from baseline to Weeks 8, 16, 32, 48, 64, 80, and 96.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 8, 16, 32, 48, 64, 80, and 96
Difference in time to UC-related complication (as in the primary outcome and secondary outcomes 2 and 3)
Time to UC-related complication (as in the primary outcome and secondary outcomes 2 and 3) in the subgroup of subjects who exclusively reach their assigned target and not a higher target by Week 48.
Time frame: Up to week 96
Evaluate the time to each type of UC-related complication
Evaluate, across the 3 target achievement groups, the time to each type of UC-related complication that comprises the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Up to week 96
Assess the effect of treatment(s) on UC-related complications
Assess the effect of treatment(s) on UC-related complications that is mediated through treatment targets.
Time frame: Up to week 96
Evaluate change in the UC-100 score from baseline to Weeks 16, 32, 48, and 96
To evaluate change in the UC-100 score from baseline to Weeks 16, 32, 48, and 96 (both in the full and the achieved-target populations). The UC-100 is a composite disease activity index consisting of clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings.The total UC-100 score ranges from 1 to 100, with higher scores representing more severe disease activity.
Time frame: Up to week 96
Evaluate changes in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)
To evaluate changes in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) from baseline to all follow-up visits.The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) includes 32 questions on 4 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL); the total score ranges from 32 and 224, with a higher score signifying a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to week 96
Evaluate changes in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-UC (WPAI-UC) questionnaire
To evaluate changes in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-UC (WPAI-UC) questionnaire from baseline to all follow-up visits.The WPAI-UC (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire) consists of 6 questions that will grade the productivity while the participant is working on a scale from 0 to 10; a higher score signifies a higher impact on work productivity.
Time frame: Up to week 96
Evaluate the change in Mayo Clinic Score (MCS; and subcomponents including the MES)
To evaluate the change in Mayo Clinic Score (MCS; and subcomponents including the MES) from baseline to Week 16,32,48 and 96/end of study (EOS). The Mayo Clinic Score for Ulcerative Colitis is a score that ranges from 0 to 12 with higher scores indicating worse severity. The score has four items (Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, Mucosal appearance at endoscopy, Physician rating of disease activity) each rated from 0 to 3, where 3 means highest severity.
Time frame: Up to week 96
Describe the change in Geboes scores from baseline to baseline to Week 16, 32, 48 and 96/end of study (EOS)
To describe the change in Geboes scores from baseline to baseline to Week 16, 32, 48 and 96/end of study (EOS). Geboes score is the most commonly used histological score in ulcerative colitis \[UC\] and is divided in 6 grades: architectural changes \[grade 0\], chronic inflammatory infiltrate \[grade 1\], lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils \[grade 2\], neutrophils in epithelium \[grade 3\], crypt destruction \[grade 4\] and erosions or ulcerations \[grade 5\].
Time frame: Up to week 96
Describe the change in RHI scores from baseline to all baseline to Week 16, 32, 48 and 96/end of study (EOS)
To describe the change in RHI scores from baseline to all baseline to Week 16, 32, 48 and 96/end of study (EOS). The Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) is a validated instrument that measures histological disease activity in ulcerative colitis. The RHI assesses four characteristics of mucosal activity, inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in epithelium, and erosion or ulceration, all of which are rated on a scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores representing more severe disease activity.
Time frame: Up to week 96
Describe the change in Nancy Histological Index scores from baseline to baseline to Week 16, 32, 48 and 96/end of study (EOS)
To describe the change in Nancy Histological Index scores from baseline to baseline to Week 16, 32, 48 and 96/end of study (EOS). The Nancy Histological Index is made up of 3 items: acute inflammatory cell infiltrates, chronic inflammatory cell infiltrates, and the presence of ulceration. Histological disease activity is graded on a 5-point scale; from grade 0 (no histologically significant disease) to grade 4 (severely active disease), with this grade being determined by the scoring algorithm.
Time frame: Up to week 96
Evaluate the numbers of AEs and SAEs among the 3 randomized groups
To evaluate the numbers of AEs and SAEs among the 3 randomized groups.
Time frame: Up to week 96
Validate the Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire for UC (SIQ-UC) tool in English-fluent subjects
To validate the Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire for Ulcerative Colitis (SIQ-UC) tool in English-fluent subjects. SIQ-UC consists of a symptom domain, which includes Gastrointestinal, pain and discomfort, nutrition-related, and fatigue-related symptoms; and an impact domain, which includes concepts related to daily activities, nutrition, emotional well-being, and productivity.
Time frame: Up to week 96
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Gomel Regional Clinical Hospital
Homyel, Homiel, Belarus
Vitebsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Vitebsk, Vitebsk Oblast, Belarus
Imelda Ziekenhuis Bonheiden
Bonheiden, Antwerp, Belgium
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, East Flanders, Belgium
UZ Leuven - University Hospital Gasthuisberg
Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgium
...and 48 more locations