To compare the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer, flowable composite, bulkfill composite and nanohybrid composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).
One hundred fourty NCCLs were randomised into four groups according to a split-mouth design. Clinical evaluations will be performed after 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, using FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Apply cavity conditioner (20% polyacrylic acid) 10 s on enamel and dentine, rinse Mix 10 s and apply bulk-fill Apply EQUIA coat and light cure for 20 s unit
Apply in 2-mm increment, light cure for 20 s
Apply in 2-mm increment light cure for 20 s
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Dentistry Faculty
Rize, Turkey (Türkiye)
evaluation of restoration on cervical lesions
According to FDI criteria (aesthetic, biological and fuctional) score 1, clinically very good; score 2, clinically good; score 3, clinically sufficient; score 4, clinically unsatisfactory; score 5, clinically poor. Scores 1-3 show clinically acceptable restoration, while scores 4 and 5 indicate failure
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Apply in single increment up to 4 mm; light curing for 20 s