This was a Phase III multi-center, randomized, two-arm parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of MBG453 or placebo added to azacitidine in adult participants with intermediate, high or very high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) as per IPSS-R, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia-2 (CMML-2) who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) according to medical judgment by the investigator. The purpose of the current study was to assess clinical effects of MBG453 in combination with azacytidine in adult participants with IPSS-R intermediate, high, very high risk MDS and CMML-2.
This was a Phase III multi-center, randomized, two-arm parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of MBG453 or placebo added to azacitidine in adult participants with intermediate, high or very high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) as per IPSS-R, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia-2 (CMML-2). The primary objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) in the MBG453 plus azacitidine arm versus placebo plus azacitidine arm where OS was the time from randomization until death due to any cause. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to treatment arms as follow: MBG453 800 mg IV Q4W plus azacitidine, Placebo IV Q4W plus azacitidine. The randomization was stratified into 4 groups: intermediate risk MDS, high risk MDS, very high risk MDS and CMML-2. All participants who discontinued both study treatments were to have entered a long-term post-treatment follow-up including response and PRO assessments, and/or survival follow-up for up to 5 years after the last participant was randomized. Participants were receiving treatment until they experienced progression of disease (including transformation to acute leukemia per WHO 2016 classification), experienced unacceptable toxicity or discontinued the study treatment for other reasons. Continuation of study treatment beyond progression (excluding transformation to acute leukemia: continuation in this case was not possible) could have been possible in selected participants.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
530
A dose of MBG453 800 mg was administered intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W).
A dose of Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 was administered IV or subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1-7, or Day 1-5, 8 and 9.
A dose of placebo 800 mg was administered intravenously every 4 weeks (Q4W).
Yuma Regional Cancer Center
Yuma, Arizona, United States
University of California LA
Los Angeles, California, United States
Yale University School Of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University Of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
Overall Survival (OS) (Primary Efficacy Results)
OS is the time from randomization until death due to any cause.
Time frame: up to approx. 39 months
Overall Survival (OS) (Final Efficacy Results)
OS is the time from randomization until death due to any cause.
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Key Secondary Endpoint 1: Time to Definitive Deterioration of Fatigue Using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score
FACIT-Fatigue score is a 13-item questionnaire designed to assess fatigue in cancer participants. All items use a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing better quality of life. Time to definitive deterioration of fatigue is defined as time from randomization to at least 3 points worsening from baseline in FACIT-fatigue scores with no subsequently observed improvement above this threshold, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Key Secondary Endpoint 2: Red Blood Cell (RBC) Annualized Transfusion Free Rate for Transfusion
Annualized transfusion free rate is defined as the average number of days in RBC transfusion-free intervals in a year (i.e., the total number of days in RBC transfusion-free intervals divided by the total days in the study multiplied by 365.25), where RBC transfusion-free intervals correspond to cumulative times of intervals with no evidence of RBC transfusion for at least 8 weeks at any point after randomization until death due to any cause.
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Key Secondary Endpoint 3: Percentage of Participants With at Least 3 Point Confirmed Improvement From Baseline in FACIT-fatigue Scores
FACIT-Fatigue score is a 13-item questionnaire designed to assess fatigue in cancer participants. All items use a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing better quality of life. The responder is defined as having 3 points improvement from baseline confirmed by a second improvement of 3 points at any time, regardless of preceding worsening. A participant who could not improve was considered as a non-responder.
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Key Secondary Endpoint 4: Percentage of Participants With at Least 10 Point Confirmed Improvement From Baseline in Physical Functioning Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer participants. Participants' responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1-5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A high score indicates a high / healthy level of functioning. The responder is defined as having 10 points improvement from baseline confirmed by a second improvement of 10 points at any time, regardless of preceding worsening. A participant who could not improve was considered as a non-responder.
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Key Secondary Endpoint 5: Percentage of Participants With at Least 10 Point Confirmed Improvement From Baseline in Emotional Functioning Using EORTC-QLQ-C30
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer participants. Participants' responses to 4 questions about their emotional functioning (Items 21-24) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A high score indicates a high / healthy level of functioning. The responder is defined as having 10 points improvement from baseline confirmed by a second improvement of 10 points at any time, regardless of preceding worsening. A participant who could not improve was considered as a non-responder.
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Percentage of Participants With Either CR, or mCR, or PR, or HI in Each Treatment Arm According to International Working Group for MDS (IWG-MDS) as Per Investigator Assessment
Response rate of participants with complete remission (CR), or marrow remission (mCR), or partial remission (PR), or hematologic improvement (HI). CR: where the Bone marrow: ≤ 5% blasts with normal maturation of all cell lineages and Peripheral blood: where Hgb ≥ 10 g/dL AND Platelets ≥ 100\*109/L AND Neutrophils ≥ 1.0\*109/L AND Peripheral blasts 0%. mCR: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% blasts and blast count decrease by ≥ 50% compared to baseline; Peripheralblood/transfusion: Marrow CR may be achieved with or without improved blood counts or with or without transfusions PR: All CR criteria except bone marrow: ≥50% decrease from baseline in blasts in bone marrow AND blast count in bone marrow \>5%. HI: restoration or enhancement of the function of the body's blood cell-producing system that must last as least 8 weeks.
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) According to International Working Group for MDS (IWG-MDS) as Per Investigator Assessment
Response rate of participants with stable disease. SD is the failure to achieve at least partial response (PR), but no evidence of progression for \>8 weeks.
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (including transformation to acute leukemia per WHO 2016), relapse from CR (IWG-MDS), or death. Disease progression: bone marrow blasts increase ≥ 50% over baseline, to \> 5% if initially \< 5%, \> 10% if 5%-\<10%, or \> 20% if 10%-\<20%. Includes a peripheral blood count decrease ≥ 50% from maximum remission/response levels: neutrophils \< 1.0x109/L, platelets \< 100x109/L, or hemoglobin drop ≥ 2 g/dL to \< 10 g/dL, becoming transfusion-dependent. Relapse from CR: baseline bone marrow blast % return, neutrophils decrease ≥ 50% to \< 1.0x109/L, platelets decrease ≥ 50% to \< 100x109/L, or hemoglobin drop ≥ 1.5 g/dL to \< 10 g/dL, becoming transfusion-dependent. Leukemia transformation: \> 20% blasts per WHO 2016 (Arber et al 2016).
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)
LFS is defined as the time from randomization to ≥ 20% blasts in bone marrow/peripheral blood (per WHO 2016 classification) or diagnosis of extramedullary acute leukemia, or death due to any cause
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Number of Participants Who Become Red Blood Cells (RBC) Transfusion Independent After Randomization
Improvement in RBC transfusion independence as per International Working Group for MDS (IWG-MDS) criteria. RBC transfusion independence was defined as having received 0 units of RBC transfusions during at least 8 consecutive weeks after randomization. The number of participants was shown in only those with transfusion dependence at baseline (BL).
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Number of Participants Who Become Platelets Transfusion Independent After Randomization
Improvement in Platelets transfusion independence as per International Working Group for MDS (IWG-MDS) criteria. Platelets transfusion independence was defined as having received 0 units of Platelets transfusions during at least 8 consecutive weeks after randomization. The number of participants was shown in only those with transfusion dependence at baseline (BL).
Time frame: up to approx. 52 months
Pharmacokinetics of MBG453 (Parameter Cmax)
Cmax is the maximum (peak) observed drug concentration after single dose administration (mass x volume-1).
Time frame: 0 hr (pre-dose) & 2 hrs (post-dose) of Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 8 and 0 hr (pre-dose) & 2 hrs (post-dose) of C3D8
Pharmacokinetics of MBG453 (Parameter AUC)
AUCinf is the AUC from time zero to infinity (mass x time x volume-1).
Time frame: 0 hr (pre-dose) & 2 hrs (post-dose) of Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 8 and 0 hr (pre-dose) & 2 hrs (post-dose) of C3D8
ADA Prevalence at Baseline and ADA-positive Participants On-treatment
Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) prevalence is the number of participants with at least one sample meeting the criteria at baseline. ADA-positive participants were calculated as the number of participants with at least one on-treatment ADA-positive sample divided by the number of participants with a determinant baseline IG sample and at least one determinant post-baseline IG sample.
Time frame: Baseline, up to approx. 39 months
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life (EuroQol) - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score Over Time
The EQ-5D-5L comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. For each of the 5 dimensions, subject's responses are scored on a 5-point scale (1=no problem to 5=extreme problems). Change from baseline is being presented for EQ Index score. Index score is defined as a weighted combination of the levels of the 5-dimention scales, ranging from 0 to 1 (perfect health), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. The United States value set from Pickard et al 2019 was used.
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to C48D1 (1 cycle = 28 days)
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Over Time
The EQ-5D-5L VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a visual analogue scale numbered from 0 to 100, with 0 being "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 being "the best health you can imagine". Change from baseline was presented.
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to C48D1 (1 cycle = 28 days)
Change From Baseline of Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scores Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30).
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer participants. Participant's responses to 2 questions (Items 29+30: "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall outcome. Change from baseline to Cycle 12 Day 1 as presented.
Time frame: Up to Cycle 12 Day 1 (C12D1) (1 cycle = 28 days)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Hackensack University Medical Ctr
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Weill Cornell Medicine NY-Presb
New York, New York, United States
University of Rochester Medical Ctr
Rochester, New York, United States
...and 139 more locations