Both people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and their family caregivers experience the impact of this neurodegenerative disease on their health and well-being. The person living with MS and their support partner need to work together as a team to find ways to manage the disease. A physical activity (PA) program that uses a 'dyadic approach' is one possible way of managing the impact of MS. Dyadic programs are unique because they target both people with the disease and their caregivers together to increase their PA levels. This pilot study will deliver a 12-week program using group teleconference and one-on-one support phone calls to teach participants simple methods to change PA patterns in daily life. For example, they will learn how to set personal goals to increase PA and reduce sitting time.
The study is an assessor-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) for examining the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a dyadic PA intervention approach for persons with MS (PwMS) affected by moderate-to-severe disability and their family caregivers (CGs). Dyads who meet the eligibility requirements will undergo the informed consent process and baseline assessment. Dyads will then be randomized to either an immediate intervention condition or a delayed control condition. Participants in the immediate intervention group will receive six group teleconference sessions, approximately 60 minutes each, every other week for 12 weeks. These sessions will be interspersed with one-on-one support calls in the weeks that group sessions do not occur. Participants will be provided with a manual for their individual use during the intervention. The intervention content will introduce participants to the concepts of shared appraisal and dyadic coping. The benefits of shared participation in PA as a coping strategy to optimize well-being at both the individual and dyadic level will be reinforced and illustrated. All participants will be taught techniques for monitoring PA behaviour, setting personalized goals to increase PA and reduce sedentary time, and strategies for overcoming challenges to PA participation. The one-to-one support calls will serve to reinforce the information provided during the group sessions, monitor safety, and troubleshoot any issues with the intervention content. All participants will undergo the assessment protocol again at 12 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
22
A dyadic physical activity intervention approach for PwMS and their family CGs affected by moderate-to-severe MS disability.
University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Safety of the PAT-MS intervention
Safety will be recorded via reporting of adverse events (AEs) during testing sessions and one-on-one support calls. AEs will be defined as any unfavorable change in health that occurs in both PwMS and CGs during the trial period, e.g. injuries, relapses, falls and symptomatic changes. Each AE will be rated based on severity, expectedness, and potential relation to study participation using the Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification scheme. AEs will be reported as the overall rate, severity, and characteristics of the events.
Time frame: Assessed weekly through study completion at 12 weeks
Feasibility: Participant recruitment rate
We will use phone call and electronic mail recruitment and record all contact with potential participants and refusal reasons.
Time frame: Recorded through the 6-month recruitment period
Feasibility: Participant compliance rate
Will be assessed by recording the number of practice activities, group teleconference sessions, and one-on-one phone calls completed by participants.
Time frame: Recorded weekly through study completion at 12 weeks
Feasibility: Participant attrition rate
Will be assessed as the percentage of the sample who drop out of the study.
Time frame: Will be assessed at T2 (12 Weeks)
Feasibility: Monetary cost of research
We will establish and record all monetary costs for the study.
Time frame: Recorded from study initiation to completion, approximately 2 years
Feasibility: Staff time
We will document all preparation, call time, attempted call time and report-taking time for each participant during the intervention.
Time frame: Recorded weekly through study completion at 12 weeks
Feasibility: Research ethics procedures
We will document communications between the research ethics board and staff, and time from submission of research ethics application to approval.
Time frame: Recorded from study initiation to completion, approximately 2 years
Feasibility: Data collection at T1
We will check for data completeness, and record time to collect, enter and check data in a database
Time frame: Will be assessed at T1 (Baseline)
Feasibility: Data collection at T2
We will check for data completeness, and record time to collect, enter and check data in a database
Time frame: Will be assessed at T2 (12 Weeks)
Change in Self-Reported Physical Activity - Primary Efficacy Outcome
Change in Self-reported physical activity (PA) level of PwMS and CGs will be assessed using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ). The GLTEQ has been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid primary outcome for measuring change in PA in response to a behavioural intervention.
Time frame: Change in Self-reported PA (total PA minutes) between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks)
Change in Accelerometer-measured Physical Activity - steps/day
Accelerometer-measured PA will be assessed as steps/day in both PwMS and CGs. At each assessment session, both PwMS and CGs will be provided with an Actigraph Activity monitor (accelerometer) to take home, along with a logbook to record the time periods in which the accelerometer was worn. Participants will be instructed to wear the accelerometer during all waking hours, except while engaging in water activities.
Time frame: Change in accelerometer-measured steps/day between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).
Change in Accelerometer-measured Physical Activity - minutes of PA
Accelerometer-measured PA will be assessed as minutes spent in sedentary behaviour, light activity, and moderate-to-vigorous activity in both PwMS and CGs. At each assessment session, both PwMS and CGs will be provided with an Actigraph Activity monitor (accelerometer) to take home, along with a logbook to record the time periods in which the accelerometer was worn. Participants will be instructed to wear the accelerometer during all waking hours, except while engaging in water activities.
Time frame: Change in accelerometer-measured minutes of PA between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).
Change in Walking Speed
Walking speed will be assessed in PwMS using the timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) test. The T25FW test will involve participants walking as quickly and safely as possible across a 25-foot distance. Participants will be asked to complete two walking trials and the average walking speed of the two trials will be reported in meters/second.
Time frame: Change in walking speed between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).
Change in Walking Endurance
Walking endurance will be assessed in PwMS using the 2-minute walk (2MW) test. The 2MW test involves participants walking as fast and as far as possible in an accessible hallway for 2 minutes. Participants will complete one walking trial.
Time frame: Change in Walking endurance between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks)
Change in Agility
Agility will be assessed in PwMS using the Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test. The TUG test involves participants rising from a chair, walking 3 meters, turning around, and then walking back to the chair and returning to the seated position. Participants will complete two trials of the TUG test. The time taken in seconds for each trial will be recorded.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Change in Agility between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).
Change in Physical Functional Limitations and Disability
Physical functional limitations and disability will be assessed in PwMS using the abbreviated Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) questionnaire. The LLFDI contains fifteen items within 3 subscales: basic lower extremity function, advanced lower extremity function, and upper extremity function. A composite score is generated by summing all three subscale scores. Higher scores indicate fewer functional limitations.
Time frame: Change in Physical functional limitations and disability between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).
Change in MS Self-Efficacy
Self-efficacy will be assessed in PwMS using the MS Self-Efficacy (MSSE) Scale. The questionnaire is an 18-item scale divided into 2 subscales: function and control. The items assess how confident individuals feel that they can achieve a specific function or control various aspects of their MS. Scores are totaled on each subscale and a total MSSE is obtained. Higher scores are associated with higher degrees of certainty.
Time frame: Change in MS self-efficacy between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).
Change in Quality of Life in PwMS
Quality of life will be assessed in PwMS using the MS Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29). The MSIS-29 questionnaire is a measure of physical and psychological health-related quality of life. Higher scores indicate a greater physical and psychological impact of MS on daily activities.
Time frame: Change in Quality of life in PwMS between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).
Change in Dyadic Relationship Quality
Dyadic relationship quality will be assessed both in PwMS and CGs using the Short-form Dyadic Adjustment Scale. The questionnaire consists of 7 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater relationship quality.
Time frame: Change in Dyadic relationship quality between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks)
Change in Perceptions of Social Support
Perceptions of social support will be assessed in both PwMS and CGs using the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12 (ISEL-12). This 12-item questionnaire is designed to measure 3 subscales (appraisal, belonging, and tangible) of perceived social support. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale.
Time frame: Change in perceptions of social support between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).
Change in Resilience
Resilience will be assessed in both PwMS and CGs using the Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10). The questionnaire evaluates perceived ability to deal with stressful and challenging situations and to overcome obstacles.
Time frame: Change in Resilience between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).
Change in Coping
Coping will be assessed in CGs using the Coping with MS Caregiving Inventory (CMSCI). The questionnaire is a measure of 34 coping strategies specific to MS caregiving. Respondents indicate on a 4-point scale how often they have used each of the coping strategies in dealing with caregiving in general in the past month.
Time frame: Change in Coping in CGs between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).
Change in Quality of Life in Caregivers
Quality of life in CGs will be assessed using the Caregiver Quality of Life in MS scale (CAREQOL-MS). The questionnaire is a measure of caregiver health-related quality of life. The scale consists of 24 items comprising the four subscales of physical stress/global health, social integration, emotion, and the need for assistance/emotional reactions. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert-type scale with higher scores reflecting worse quality of life.
Time frame: Change in Quality of life in CGs between T1 (Baseline) and T2 (12 Weeks).