For marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) Rituximab in combination with conventional chemotherapy is widely used for those patients who fail local therapy or do not qualify for such. Depending on the MZL subtype Rituximab/chemotherapy is able to induce in part long remissions, but does not prevent relapse later on. In addition, chemotherapy associated toxicity is often problematic in MZL patients, who are mostly of advanced age. Thus, chemotherapy-free approaches are highly attractive for this patient group. Rituximab single agent is a widely used chemotherapy-free approach in MZL, but was significantly inferior compared to Rituximab/chlorambucil in a large randomized prospective clinical trial in treatment naïve MZL with a CR rate of 55.8% vs. 78.8%, respectively (P \< 0.001). Thus, it is the major aim to develop chemotherapy-free approaches for MZL, which approach or surpass efficacy of rituximab/chemotherapy combinations, but avoid chemotherapy associated toxicities. Checkpoint inhibitors such as Pembrolizumab have revolutionized cancer treatment and have also shown first encouraging results in Non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Based on these observations it is the aim of this study to test the toxicity and efficacy of Pembrolizumab in combination with the anti-CD20 antibody Rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed MZL in need of treatment, who are not eligible or failed local therapy, following the assumption that this novel chemotherapy-free combination is significantly more efficient than Rituximab single agent therapy and at least as efficient as rituximab/chemotherapy, but avoids chemotherapy-related toxicity.
For marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) Rituximab in combination with conventional chemotherapy is widely used for those patients who fail local therapy or do not qualify for such. Depending on the MZL subtype Rituximab/chemotherapy is able to induce in part long remissions, but does not prevent relapse later on. In addition, chemotherapy associated toxicity is often problematic in MZL patients, who are mostly of advanced age. Thus, chemotherapy-free approaches are highly attractive for this patient group. Rituximab single agent is a widely used chemotherapy-free approach in MZL, but was significantly inferior compared to Rituximab/chlorambucil in a large randomized prospective clinical trial in treatment naïve MZL with a CR rate of 55.8% vs. 78.8%, respectively (P \< 0.001). Thus, it is the major aim to develop chemotherapy-free approaches for MZL, which approach or surpass efficacy of rituximab/chemotherapy combinations, but avoid chemotherapy associated toxicities. Checkpoint inhibitors such as Pembrolizumab have revolutionized cancer treatment and have also shown first encouraging results in Non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Based on these observations it is the aim of this study to test the toxicity and efficacy of Pembrolizumab in combination with the anti-CD20 antibody Rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed MZL in need of treatment, who are not eligible or failed local therapy, following the assumption that this novel chemotherapy-free combination is significantly more efficient than Rituximab single agent therapy and at least as efficient as rituximab/chemotherapy, but avoids chemotherapy-related toxicity. The objective of the trial is to test the efficacy and toxicity of treatment with Pembrolizumab and Rituximab in patients with MZL in need of treatment, who have failed or are not eligible for local therapy or relapsed. For efficacy the rate of complete remissions (according to the GELA criteria for gastric MALT or to the Cheson 2007 criteria for nodal and splenic MZL) after end of treatment (18 cycles) will be primarily analyzed. For toxicity assessment treatment associated adverse events, quality of life and cumulative incidence of secondary malignancies will be documented. This study is a European multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial of 18 cycles of Pembrolizumab and Rituximab in patients aged ≥ 18 years with previously untreated or relapsed MZL in need of treatment. Primary endpoint is the complete response (CR rate (CRR) determined after end of treatment (18 cycles). The study flow will be as follows: * Previously untreated or relapsed patients will be screened for eligibility for the trial. If the patient is eligible for the study, the patient will be registered before the first cycle of treatment. * Patients who progress at any time point during treatment are considered as treatment failure. They will be followed up for overall survival until end of follow up period or death. * Patients, who achieve at least a SD after treatment will be followed up for response until progression/relapse and for overall survival until death. It is expected that a total of 56 patients at approximately 15 investigator sites in Germany and 3 centers in Austria will be registered. Every patient will receive treatment over a time period of 18 cycles (each cycle lasts 3 weeks). Subsequently, patients will be monitored every 3 months for 2 additional years, subsequently every 6 months for three additional years. The follow-up phase will be shorter than 5 years if End of Study is reached before this time period.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
22
100 mg concentrate for solution for infusion
100 mg/ 4mL concentrate for solution for infusion
Universitätsklinikum Ulm; Klinik für Innere Medizin Innere Medizin III
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Hämatologie - Onkologie - Tumorimmunologie
Berlin, Germany
Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin III
Chemnitz, Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. med. Johannes Mohm, Dr. med. Gabriele Prange-Krex
Dresden, Germany
Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH; Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Gastroenterologie
Mönchengladbach, Germany
Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III
München, Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie
Münster, Germany
Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin, Onkologie und Hämatologie
Oldenburg, Germany
Brüderkrankenhaus St. Josef, Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie
Paderborn, Germany
Klinikum Passau, II. Medizinische Klinik - Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin
Passau, Germany
...and 2 more locations
CR Rate
CR rate (CRR) 4 weeks after end of treatment (18 cycles) according to the GELA (Copie-Bergman C, Gaulard P, Lavergne-Slove A, Brousse N, Flejou JF, Dordonne K, et al. Proposal for a new histological grading system for post-treatment evaluation of gastric MALT lymphoma. Gut 2003 Nov; 52(11): 1656.) criteria for gastric MALT or to the Cheson 2007 (Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007 Feb 10; 25(5): 579-586.) criteria for non-gastric extranodal, nodal and splenic MZL: Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.
Time frame: 4 weeks after end of treatment (18 cycles), approx. 58 weeks
Response Rate
The response rates are evaluated 4 weeks after end of treatment (18 cycles) according to the GELA criteria for gastric MALT or to the Cheson 2007 criteria for non-gastric extranodal, nodal and splenic MZL: Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy. Partial Response (PR): \>50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by ≥ 50% in their SPD or, for single nodules, in the greatest transversal diameter. Stable Disease (SD): not meeting CR, PR or PD criteria Progressive Disease (PD): appearance of any new lesion or \>50% increase from nadir of previously involved lesions.
Time frame: 4 weeks after end of treatment (18 cycles), approx. 58 weeks
Best Response
Best response is determined in the time interval from the start of induction therapy to end of follow-up according to the GELA criteria for gastric MALT or to the Cheson 2007 criteria for non-gastric extranodal, nodal and splenic MZL: Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy. Partial Response (PR): \>50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by ≥ 50% in their SPD or, for single nodules, in the greatest transversal diameter. Stable Disease (SD): not meeting CR, PR or PD criteria Progressive Disease (PD): appearance of any new lesion or \>50% increase from nadir of previously involved lesions.
Time frame: 2.1 - 33.2 months
Time to Best Response
Time to best response is defined as the time from the start of induction to best response the patient achieves (CR, PR)
Time frame: 2.1 - 33.2 months
Time to First Response
Time to first response is defined as the time from the start of induction to first response (CR, PR)
Time frame: 2.1 - 33.2 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the probability for not showing disease progression as assessed by the investigator, or death from any cause within 12 months from registration. PFS for patients without disease progression, relapse, or death was censored at the time of the last tumor assessment if patients were observed for less than 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
Time to treatment failure is defined as the time of registration to discontinuation of therapy for any reason including death from any cause, progression, toxicity or add-on of new anti-cancer therapy. Patients alive without treatment failure are censored at the latest tumor assessment date.
Time frame: 2.1 - 33.2 months
Duration of Response (DR)
The probability that the response takes 6 month will be calculated. Patients alive without progression and relapse will be censored at the latest tumor assessment date or the stopping date.
Time frame: 6 months
Cause Specific Survival (CSS)
Cause specific survival is the number of subjects who have not died due to lymphoma until the end of study.
Time frame: 2.1 - 33.2 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is the number of patients who have not died until the end of study.
Time frame: 2.1 - 33.2 months
Quality of Life During Trial
Quality of life will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) questionnaire, before start of treatment and during trial participation. The FACT-Lym total score combines the subscales for physical, social/family, emotional and functional well-being with a lymphoma subscale representing lymphoma symptoms. The sum of those subscale scores are the total score, which ranged from 0 to 168 whereby higher values represent a better quality of life.
Time frame: End of treatment (4 weeks after cycle 18, approx. 58 weeks)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.