The objective of the current study is to assess the immunogenicity and safety of transitioning subjects with RA to DRL\_RI from US-rituximab/EU-rituximab to continued treatment with US-rituximab/EU-rituximab. The primary objective of this study is to assess the immunogenicity of transitioning subjects with RA to DRL\_RI (biosimilar rituximab) from US-rituximab/EU-rituximab to continued treatment with US-rituximab/EU-rituximab To assess the safety of transitioning subjects with RA to DRL\_RI from US-rituximab/EU-rituximab to continued treatment with US-rituximab/EU-rituximab.
This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter, Phase 3 transition study in subjects with active RA who are eligible for the subsequent treatment course with US-rituximab or EU-rituximab according to the clinical judgment of the investigator. Subjects will then be randomized by interactive web response system (IWRS) to receive either two 1000 mg infusions of DRL\_RI (Arm A) or US-rituximab/EU-rituximab (Arm B) on Day 1 and Day 15. Subjects randomized to Arm A will receive DRL\_RI and subjects randomized to Arm B will continue to receive either US-rituximab or EU-rituximab. The study will consist of a screening period (Days -14 to 0) and a double-blind period (Day 1 to Week 12). Subjects will attend a screening visit followed by a visit at Weeks 0 (Day 1), 2, 4, 8, and 12 after randomization It is planned that approximately 50 sites will be initiated for this study in up to 7 countries (including but not restricted to United States). There has been no randomization of patients till date for this study. The study endpoints include: The immunogenicity endpoint is: • The incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA), including titer and neutralizing antibodies (NAb). The primary safety endpoints are: * Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). * Incidence of anaphylactic reactions, hypersensitivity reactions, and IRRs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
140
Proposed rituximab biosimilar, 100mg or 500mg, concentrate for solution for infusion
Reference product US- rituximab (Rituxan®) or EU-rituximab (MabThera®), 100mg or 500mg, concentrate for solution for infusion
Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research, PLLC
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
California Allergy and Asthma Medical Group - CRN - PPDS 41230 11th Street West, Suite A
Palmdale, California, United States
Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials Incorporated
Upland, California, United States
Rheumatology Consultant of Delaware dba Delaware Arthritis
Lewes, Delaware, United States
MedBio Trials
Aventura, Florida, United States
Number of Subjects With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) on Day 1
For Immunogenicity: Number of subjects with positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) on Day 1 was reported
Time frame: ADA will be obtained before the administration of study treatment on Day 1
Number of Subjects With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) on Day 15
For Immunogenicity: Number of subjects with positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) on Day 15 was reported
Time frame: ADA will be obtained before the administration of study treatment on Day 15
Number of Subjects With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) at Week 4
For Immunogenicity: Number of subjects with positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) at Week 4 was reported
Time frame: ADA will be obtained before the administration of study treatment at Week 4
Number of Subjects With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) at Week 8
For Immunogenicity: Number of subjects with positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) at Week 8 was reported
Time frame: ADA will be obtained before the administration of study treatment at Week 8
Number of Subjects With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) at Week 12 Visits
For Immunogenicity: Number of subjects with positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) at Week 12 visits was reported
Time frame: ADA will be obtained at Week 12
Number of Subjects Reporting Anaphylactic Reactions at Dosing Time Points (Either at Week 1 or Week 3)
Number of Subjects reporting anaphylactic reactions during the study drug administration either at Week 1 or Week 3 was reported
Time frame: Assessments of Anaphylactic reactions will be carried out at either Week 1 or Week 3
Number of Subjects Reporting TEAEs (Treatment Emergent Adverse Events) That Led to Study Drug Discontinuation at Either Week 1 or Week 3 Dosing Timepoint
TEAEs (Treatment emergent adverse events) which lead to study subjects discontinuation from the study drug administration at either week 1 or week 3 dosing timepoint
Time frame: Assessment of AE's (Adverse Events) that led to study drug discontinuation were carried out at either week 1 or week 3 dosing timepoint
Number of Subjects Reporting SAEs (Serious Adverse Events) From Baseline (Week 1) to End of Study (Week 26)
Incidence of SAEs: SAE is defined as "Results in death, is life-threatening, Requires in-subject hospitalization or prolongs existing hospitalization, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity". The measure here is only subjects reporting SAE.
Time frame: Assessment of SAE's was carried out from baseline (week 1) to end of study (week 26)
Number of TEAEs Reported From Baseline (Week 1) to End of Study (Week 26)
Number of TEAEs: Treatment-emergent AE are defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study medication.
Time frame: Assessment of AE's will be carried out from baseline (week 1) to end of study (week 26)
Number of Subjects Reporting AE From Baseline (Week 1) to End of Study (Week 26)
number of subjects reporting AE in the overall study are defined as any AE occurring or worsening after the ICF signed in the study
Time frame: Assessment of AE's will be carried out from baseline (week 1) to end of study (week 26)
Number of Subjects Reporting TEAEs From Baseline (Week 1) to End of Study (Week 26)
Number of subjects reporting Treatment-emergent AE (TEAEs) are defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study medication.
Time frame: Assessment of AE's will be carried out from baseline (week 1) to end of study (week 26)
Number of Subjects Reporting Hypersensitivity Reactions at Dosing Time Points (Either at Week 1 or Week 3)
Safety assessment will be done by measuring hypersensitivity reactions at Dosing Time Points (Either at Week 1 or Week 3)
Time frame: Assessments of hypersensitivity reactions either at Week 1 or Week 3
Number of Subjects Reporting Infusion-related Reactions (IRRs) at Dosing Time Points (Either at Week 1 or Week 3)
Safety assessment: Number of Subjects Reporting Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) at Dosing Time Points (Either at Week 1 or Week 3) was reported
Time frame: Assessments of IRRs were carried out at either Week 1 or Week 3
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Clinical Research of West Florida Inc - Clearwater
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Medical Research Center
Miami, Florida, United States
AppleMed Research Group, LLC
Miami, Florida, United States
Integral Rheumatology and Immunology Specialist, 140 Southwest 84th Avenue, Suite B
Plantation, Florida, United States
Vicis Clinical Research INC
Tampa, Florida, United States
...and 16 more locations