Closed-loop systems are becoming an integral part of diabetes management. These systems were uniformly proven to improve glycemic control, reduce hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia while modestly reducing HbA1c levels and improving quality of life. While overnight control is close to optimal under closed loop control, postprandial hyperglycemia during daytime remains a challenge. The advanced hybrid closed loop system was designed with an improved auto-basal control and additional auto-bolus module that delivers correction boluses automatically. In addition, this system was developed to improve user experience by significantly reducing the amount of alarms and exits from Auto Mode. Therefore, this system might have an advance in treating hyperglycemia over the hybrid closed loop that controls glucose levels by modulation of insulin basal rate only. Therefore, we propose the current study that will compare 6 weeks glycemic control using hybrid closed loop versus advanced hybrid closed loop that add correction boluses among young children and adolescents. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of 6 weeks glucose control using Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL-670G) compared to Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop System (AHCL- 670G) in young subjects with sub-optimally controlled type 1 diabetes. A total of 28 subjects (age 7-14 years) will be enrolled at two investigational centers. At the end of the cross-over study participants will be offered with an extension period, during which they will be offered to use their preferred closed-loop system for another 3 months
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
28
Hybrid closed loop system
Advanced hybrid closed loop system
Diabetes -Zentrum fuer kinder und jugendliche
Hanover, Germany
Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel
Petah Tikva, Israel
Percentage of time of glucose sensor readings within 70 to 180 mg/dl
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Percentage of time of glucose sensor readings below 54 mg/dl
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover
Percentage of time of glucose levels spent below 70 mg/dl
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Percentage of time of glucose levels spent above 180 mg/dl
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Average glucose sensor readings
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Standard deviation of glucose sensor readings
Time frame: 6 week for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Fasting blood glucose levels
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
HbA1c change
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Amount of total insulin delivery
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Amount of basal insulin delivery
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Amount of bolus insulin delivery
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Serious Adverse Device Events (SADE)
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Unanticipated Adverse Device effects (UADE)
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
Incidence of Severe Hypoglycemia
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
incidence of DKA
Time frame: 6 weeks for each arm of the crossover, day 90 of the extension period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.