Liver and Metabolic Effects of Insulin Pump Therapy in Diabetics Type 2 with Non-alcoholic Hepatic Steatosis

Nantes University Hospital46 enrolled

Overview

The prevalence of fatty liver disease (NAFLD: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or to a more severe degree NASH: Non-Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis) reached 40-70% in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). NAFLD can be easily detected by performing a hepatic ultrasonography. The presence of a NAFLD is positively correlated with the severity of insulin resistance and dysglycemia in this population. The presence of NAFLD worsens the prognosis of T2D with an increased cardiovascular risk. This hepatic impairment would also increase the risk of microvascular complications, especially nephropathy. Conversely, T2D increases the risk of transition from NAFLD to NASH and then to hepatic fibrosis and its related complications (cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma). The risk of progression of liver steatosis to fibrosis is also more important as diabetes and insulin resistance are more severe. In addition to diabetes and insulin resistance, other risk factors are associated with more severe liver damage such as changes in microbiota. Indeed, it has already been described a smaller amount of bacteroides in the microbiota of subjects with T2D and the most severe hepatic impairment. The treatment of NAFLD/NASH is poorly codified without approved drugs in this indication, while many phase 3 trials with candidate drugs are undergoing. Life-style measures (physical activity and low carbohydrate/calorie diet) can limit the progression from NAFLD to more severe liver fibrosis. Some bariatric surgery studies have also shown good results in this situation. Pharmacological interventions are also reported with proven efficacy of pioglitazone, vitamin E and orlistat. The OPT2MISE study has recently shown the superiority of insulin pump (or continuous sub-cutaneous insulin infusion: CSII) compared to multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) to improve glycemic control in a population of patients with T2D in failure of well-titrated MDI. In addition, treatment with CSII showed a 45% decrease in insulin resistance (assessed by HOMA-IR) in a population of newly diagnosed T2D. In light of these data, investigators hypothesize that the introduction of insulin pump treatment in a population of subjects with T2D and NAFLD, by improving insulin sensitivity, could reduce fatty liver content compared to standard MDI treatment.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 37 YearsMax age: 70 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Male / female 35/70 years (including ranges) with T2D ≥ 1 year * Benefiting from the indication of use of the free Freestyle glucose meter * Treatment with multi-injection insulin therapy comprising a daily injection of basal insulin (Glargine U100, Glargine U300, Degludec) and at least 2 daily injections of an insulin analogue (lispro, aspart or glulisine) +/- metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) and/or sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) at a dose stable for at least 3 months. * For women of childbearing age, oestro-progestative pill, IUD, implant. * 11% ≥ HbA1c ≥ 6.5% * Presence of hepatic steatosis according to the ultrasonography * Absence of chronic alcoholic intoxication * Absence of chronic viral hepatitis or other chronic liver diseases (eg hemochromatosis ...) Exclusion Criteria: * Type 1 diabetes * Contraindication to pump treatment * Treatment with anti-diabetics or other than metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) and/or sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) * Treatment with basal inulin of Levemir * Contraindication to performing MRI * Chronic alcohol abuse (after alcohol consumption\> 20g / day in men and\> 10g / day in women) according to the medical examination * Chronic viral hepatitis based on HBV and HCV serology results * Hemochromatosis according to the martial assessment * Other toxic or drug hepatitis * Severe hepatic pathology: hepatic cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma * Severe renal insufficiency (MDRD \<30 ml / min) * Severe and progressive cardiovascular pathology * Treatment (permanent or intermittent) with glucocorticoids * Treatment known to improve hepatic steatosis (glitazone, vitamin E, orlistat) * history or bariatric surgery project for the duration of the study * Drug treatment likely to cause hepatic steatosis (amiodarone, carbamazepine, tamoxifen, valproate, clozapine, anti-retroviral drugs) unless the dose has been stable for ≥ 3 months * Guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice

Locations (9)

CHU

Angers, France

CHU

Caen, France

CHU

Dijon, France

CHU

La Rochette, France

Hospices Civils

Lyon, France

Nantes UH

Nantes, France

CHU

Poitiers, France

CHU de Rennes

Rennes, France

CHU

Toulouse, France

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Variation of hepatic steatosis, between the insulin pump therapy (CSII) vs Multi injection treatement (MDI) groups.

Change of fatty liver by MRI quantification

Time frame: 6 months

Secondary Outcomes

In the CSII group : avantage of an insulin pump treatment on the fatty liver between inclusion and the 6th month,

Variation of hepatic steatosis (MRI quantization by gradient echo sequences \& centralized reading

Time frame: 6 months

In the CSII group : avantage of an insulin pump treatment on the fatty liver (quantified by MRI), between inclusion and the 12th month,

Variation of hepatic steatosis (MRI quantization by gradient echo sequences \& centralized reading

Time frame: 12 months

Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months, on hepatic biological parameters and non-invasive biomarkers of fatty liver (FLI) and of fibrosis of the liver (FIB-4 and NAFLD Score),

Liver fonction (AST ; ALAT ; GGT ; PAL ; Ferritin) Test-fibrosis score criteria (FIB- 4 and NAFLD Score) ; FLI

Time frame: 6 months

Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on insulin sensitivity

dosage of plasma adiponectin

Time frame: 6 months

Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on insulin sensitivity

calculation of the modified HOMA-IR index (peptide C, blood sugar),

Time frame: 6 months

Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on glycemic balance

HbA1c dosages

Time frame: 6 months

Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on the total daily insulin dose

daily insulin dose record

Time frame: 6 months