Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a major health problem leading to significant morbidity and even mortality. Patients with superficial femoral artery stenosis make up an important proportion of patients with PAD, and since this type of involvement was reported to be most commonly associated with intermittent claudication, this patient population has been subject to intensive research on methods to prevent disease progression and further complications. Endovascular treatment has become the first-line treatment for low-complexity femoropopliteal (FP) lesions classified as TASC (Trans Atlantic Inter-Societal Consensus) A and B. Conversely, in case of more extensive lesions (TASC C), this treatment is still under debate because of a primary permeability that is difficult to maintain over time. Recently, studies have shown the interest of drug eluting technologies in the treatment of TASC A \& B femoral-popliteal lesions, by significantly improving patency rates compared to uncoated balloons or stents. In this context, the endovascular treatment of FP complex lesions (TASC C) continues to develop widely. During endovascular treatment, the quality of the artery preparation has recently been identified as a factor improving outcomes. The dilatation of the artery with an uncoated balloon or POBA (Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty) is the reference method performed before stent placement or drug-coated balloons. However, some new alternatives to prepare the artery have emerged, using no more dilatation but atherectomy (Jetstream™ system). Atherectomy appears to reduce the risk of dissections and bailout stenting and improve the acute procedural results. Its long term outcome, when associated with drug coated balloons (DCB), has recently been demonstrated in the USA to be superior to angioplasty in a single center study JET-SCE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of atherectomy, using the Jetstream™ artery preparation associated to DCB treatment (Ranger™ Paclitaxel-Coated balloon), in symptomatic patients with claudication (Rutherford 2 and 3) and with complex de novo FP arterial lesions (TASC C).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
55
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of atherectomy, using the Jetstream™ artery preparation associated to DCB treatment (Ranger™ Paclitaxel-Coated balloon), in symptomatic patients with claudication (Rutherford 2 and 3) and with complex de novo femoropopliteal arterial lesions (TASC C).
Hopital Prive de Provence
Aix-en-Provence, France
Clinique Rhône Durance
Avignon, France
Polyclinique Notre Dame
Draguignan, France
Hopital Europeen
Marseille, France
Hôpital Saint Joseph
Marseille, France
Clinique Saint Georges
Nice, France
Clinique Les Franciscaines
Nîmes, France
Polyclinique Les Fleurs
Ollioules, France
Freedom of Target lesion revascularization
Percent of patients with freedom of any percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass on target lesions, performed because of restenosis or any other complication involving the target lesion
Time frame: 12 months
Primary patency
exempt from restenosis of the target lesion during follow-up (Doppler ultrasound)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 6, Month12, Month 24
Primary assisted patency
patency of the target lesion following endovascular reintervention at the target vessel site in case of symptomatic restenosis (Doppler ultrasound)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 6, Month12, Month 24
Secondary patency
patency of the target lesion after treatment of a (re)occlusion of the index lesion
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 6, Month12, Month 24
Late Lumen Loss
defined as the difference between the minimal luminal diameter at the end of the procedure and the minimal luminal diameter at follow-up measured by CT Angiography.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2-Month 6
technical success of the procedure
ability to pass through (intra-luminal passage) and dilate the lesion to obtain residual stenosis under angiography ≤30%.
Time frame: Day 0
Procedural success
technical success without undesirable major event observed within 24 hours post-procedure.
Time frame: Day 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.