This study compares the effectiveness and safety of two radiation treatment techniques for patients with multiple brain metastases.
For patients suffering from multiple brain metastases whole brain radiation therapy still constitutes a standard therapy. However, because of the risk of neurocognitive side effects as well as reduced local tumor control, employment of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is becoming more common. The disadvantage of SRS alone may be poor intracranial tumor control because of frequent appearance of new distant brain metastases after therapy. In recent years hippocampal avoidance whole brain therapy has been shown to minimize treatment related side effects while reducing the rate of distant intracranial failure. In this study patients will be randomized to receive either hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy with integrated tumor boost (HA-WBRT+SIB) or stereotactic radiosurgery. The investigators hypothesize that HA-WBRT+SIB can improve intracranial tumor control compared to stereotactic radiosurgery, while avoiding additional neurocognitive side effects.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
150
Hippocampal avoiding Whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a prescribed dose of 30Gy in 12 fractions, 2.5Gy per fraction and a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) to each brain metastasis of 51Gy to 95% of PTV in 12 Fractions, 4.25Gy per fraction.
Single session or hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of multiple brain metastases. Single session SRS will be delivered in 18 to 22Gy to the tumour encompassing 80% Isodose. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HfSRS) will be delivered in 5 sessions of 6Gy each to the tumour encompassing 80% isodose.
Medical University Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria
RECRUITINGIntracranial Progression free survival
survival with freedom from both local and distant intracranial progression, measured in months from end of treatment until progression or death, assessed in follow-up imaging (MRI, FET-PET)
Time frame: up to 18 months
Neurocognitive function assessed by VLMT
Change of z-scores of VLMT (Verbaler Lern- und Merkfähigkeitstest) to baseline examination
Time frame: up to 18 months
Neurocognitive function assessed by COWAT
Change of z-scores of COWAT (controlled oral word association test) to baseline examination
Time frame: up to 18 months
Neurocognitive function assessed by TMT
Change of z-scores of TMT (trail making test) to baseline examination
Time frame: up to 18 months
Local control rate
rate of progression of treated metastases assessed in follow-up imaging (MRI, FET-PET)
Time frame: up to 18 months
Survival time
time from end of treatment to death
Time frame: up to 18 months
Quality of Life Score assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Change in Quality of Life Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 (Quality of life core module) relative to baseline
Time frame: up to 18 months
Quality of Life Score assessed by QLQ-BN20 questionnaire
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change in Quality of Life Score of QLQ-BN20 (quality of life brain cancer module) relative to baseline
Time frame: up to 18 months