The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose for expansion (RDFE), safety and tolerability of BGB-10188 as monotherapy in participants with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mature B-cell malignancies; in combination with zanubrutinib in participants with R/R follicular lymphoma (FL), R/R mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); and in combination with tislelizumab in participants with advanced solid tumors.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
97
Administered as specified in the treatment arm
Administered as specified in the treatment arm
Administered as specified in the treatment arm
Blacktown Cancer and Haematology Centre
Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia
Saint Vincents Hospital Sydney
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
Pindara Private Hospital
Benowa, Queensland, Australia
Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation
Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Monash Health
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Austin Health
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Perth Blood Institute
West Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Fujian Cancer Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
...and 14 more locations
Part A: The Recommended Dose for Expansion (RDFE) of BGB-10188 Monotherapy in Hematologic Malignancies
The RDFE of BGB-10188 monotherapy in participants with hematologic malignancies was planned to be determined from safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and any other relevant and available data based on recommendations from the Safety Monitoring Committee. Part A dose-escalation enrolled participants with R/R CLL/SLL, MZL, FL, MCL, and DLBCL up to 540 mg, however the maximum tolerated dose was not reached and the RDFE could not be determined based on the data that were collected.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Part B: The RDFE of BGB-10188 in Combination With Zanubrutinib in Hematologic Malignancies
The RDFE of BGB-10188 in combination with zanubrutinib was planned to be determined from safety, tolerability, PK, and any other relevant and available data obtained, based on recommendation of the Safety Monitoring Committee. The RDFE could not be determined since not all planned dose cohorts in this part of the study were enrolled and not enough data were collected to establish the RDFE.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Part D: The RDFE of BGB-10188 in Combination With Tislelizumab in Advanced Solid Tumors
The RDFE of BGB-10188 in combination with tislelizumab was determined based on the totality of safety, tolerability, PK, and any other relevant and available data that were obtained from the dose escalation phase for Part E.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Part E: Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Per RECIST v.1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: Up to 10.0 months
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drugs, whether considered related to study drugs or not. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability, was a congenital anomaly or was considered a medically significant. TEAE was an AE that has an onset date or a worsening in severity from baseline on or after the first dose of study drug. Severity of AEs was assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v.5.0, which consists of: Grade 1 Mild; Grade 2 Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4: Life-threatening; Grade 5: Death due to AE.
Time frame: Part A: 47.2 Months; Part B: 24 Months; Part D: 15.2 Months; Part E: 10 Months
Parts A and B: ORR as Assessed by Investigator
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had CR or PR as determined from investigator-derived tumor assessments per RECIST v. 1.1. Per RECIST v.1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: Part A: up to 47.2 months and Part B: up to 24 months
Part A: Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of BGB-10188 After a Single Dose
Cmax of BGB-10188 after a single dose was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 168 hours post-dose on Day -7 (each cycle = 28 days)
Part A: Cmax of BGB-10188 at Steady State
Cmax of BGB-10188 at steady state was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle = 28 days)
Part A: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) After Single Dose
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve of BGB-10188 from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8,12, and 24 hours post-dose on Day-7 (each cycle = 28 days)
Part B: Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from the first determination of an overall response per RECIST v1.1 until the first documentation of progression (PD) or death, whichever came first. Median DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Per RECIST v1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Part B: Time to Response (TTR)
TRR was defined as the time from treatment initiation to the first documentation of response. Per RECIST v.1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Part B: Cmax of BGB-10188 After a Single Dose
Cmax of BGB-10188 after a single dose when given in combination with zanubrutinib was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5,1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Part B: Cmax of BGB-10188 at Steady State
Cmax of BGB-10188 at steady state when given in combination with zanubrutinib was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle = 28 days)
Part B: AUC 0-24 h of BGB-10188 After a Single Dose
AUC 0-24 h of BGB-10188 after a single dose when given in combination with zanubrutinib was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Part D: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had CR or PR as determined from investigator-derived tumor assessments per RECIST v. 1.1. Per RECIST v.1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: Up to 15.2 months
Parts D and E: Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from the first determination of an overall response per RECIST v1.1 until the first documentation of PD or death, whichever came first. Median DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Per RECIST v1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum in the study. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was to be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment.
Time frame: Part D: up to 15.2 months and Part E: up to 10.0 months
Parts D and E: Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR), as per RECIST v.1.1, of a CR, PR, or stable disease (SD). Per RECIST v.1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time frame: Part D: up to 15.2 months and Part E: up to 10.0 months
Parts D and E: Time to Response (TTR)
TTR was defined as the time from treatment initiation to the first documentation of response. Per RECIST v.1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: Part D: up to 15.2 months and Part E: up to 10.0 months
Part D: Cmax of BGB-10188 After a Single Dose
Cmax of BGB-10188 after a single dose when given in combination with tislelizumab was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Part D: Cmax of BGB-10188 at Steady State
Cmax of BGB-10188 at steady state when given in combination with tislelizumab was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)
Part D: AUC 0-24h of BGB-10188 After Single Dose
AUC 0-24 h of BGB-10188 after a single dose when given in combination with tislelizumab was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Part D: AUC 0-24h of BGB-10188 at Steady State
AUC 0-24 h of BGB-10188 at steady state when given in combination with tislelizumab was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)
Part E: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study drugs to the date of the first documentation of PD assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Per RECIST v1.1, PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
Time frame: Up to 10.0 months
Part E: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response, as defined by RECIST v1.1, of a CR, PR, or at least 24 weeks of SD. Per RECIST v.1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time frame: Up to 10.0 months
Part E: Cancer Antigen (CA)-125 Response Rate Per Gynecological Cancer Intergroup
CA-125 response rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a CA-125 response according to the Gynecological Cancer Center Intergroup criteria, in which a response had occurred if there was at least a 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from baseline.
Time frame: Up to 10.0 months
Part E: Cmax of BGB-10188 After Single Dose
Cmax of BGB-10188 after a single dose when given in combination with tislelizumab was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)
Part E: Cmax of BGB-10188 at Steady State
Cmax of BGB-10188 at steady state when given in combination with tislelizumab was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)
Part E: AUC0-24h of BGB-10188 After Single Dose
AUC0-24 h of BGB-10188 after a single dose when given in combination with tislelizumab was determined.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 hours post-dose of Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)