The majority of early breast cancer patients are treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) as part of their multimodal therapy. The aim of the RT is to lower the risk of local, regional and distant failure and improve survival. Modern RT is been provided with photon therapy. Now, more proton therapy facilities are opened, including in Denmark. Proton RT may have the potential to cause lower dose to heart and lung during breast RT. This trial will randomise patients between standard photon RT versus experimental proton RT. The primary endpoint is 10 year risk of heart disease.
Adjuvant breast cancer radiation therapy (RT) is standard for all patients operated with breast conservation and for patients diagnosed with large tumours and/or node-positive disease. Around 65% of all breast cancer patients treated with RT have whole breast RT without nodal RT, whilst the remaining 35% are treated with loco-regional RT (target is breast / chest wall and regional nodal volumes). RT leads to fewer local and regional recurrences, a decrease in breast cancer death and improves overall survival. Since 2014, when the DBCG IMN study showed overall survival gain from internal mammary node (IMN) RT, IMN RT has been standard for all high-risk patients in Denmark. IMN RT causes a significant increase in dose to the heart and lung, thus heart and lung sparing RT techniques based on deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), volumetric arc therapy and tomotherapy are increasingly used to lower dose to heart and lung whilst maintaining dose to breast and nodal targets. These advanced techniques are used in all DBCG departments routinely. Despite using advanced RT techniques, some patients still receive high RT dose to heart and lung. Proton therapy (PT) has not been widely used nor investigated for adjuvant breast cancer RT, because there are only few proton centres. However, due to the properties of PT it is possible to achieve optimal dose coverage of relevant targets and at the same time ensure low dose to organs at risk compared with photon RT. In an energy-dependent manner, PT will deposit the majority of its dose in tissue depths defined by the Bragg peak. In practice, this translates into i) the ability to deliver the peak energy to target volumes of irregular 3-dimensional shape using pencil-beam scanning technology, ii) a sharp dose fall-off following deposition of energy in the target and iii) reduction of the integral dose to the patient. Within millimeters, the exit dose drops off from 90% to 10%, resulting in the virtual absence of an exit dose. The effectiveness, safety and feasibility of PT has been reported in few small cohort studies with limited follow up, and there is a lack of clinically controlled randomised trials documenting benefit from PT, evaluated either as higher tumour control and/or as fewer morbidities. This trial tests standard photon RT versus experimental proton RT for selected early breast cancer patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,502
The intervention is proton radiation therapy versus photon radiation therapy
Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, Denmark
RECRUITINGAarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Denmark
RECRUITINGThe Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group
Copenhagen, Denmark
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGRigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
RECRUITINGHerlev Hospital
Herlev, Denmark
RECRUITINGNaestved Hospital
Næstved, Denmark
RECRUITINGOdense University Hospital
Odense, Denmark
RECRUITINGVejle Hospital
Vejle, Denmark
RECRUITINGRadiation associated ischaemic and valvular heart disease
The following incidences heart diseases according to ICD10: ischaemic heart disease codes I20-25 and valvular heart disease codes I00-09, I01.0, I09.2, I34-39
Time frame: 10 years after RT
Radiation associated second cancer
Incidences of second cancer associated with the RT: lung, esophagus, thyroid, sarcoma, contralateral breast
Time frame: 10 years after RT
Distant failure
Incidences of distant failures, i.e. cancer recurrence outside the loco-regional region
Time frame: 10 years after RT
Acute radiation associated morbidity
According to CTC version 4.0: Incidences of radiation dermatitis, itching, pain, fatigue, dyspnea, cough, pneumonitis, dysphagia, increased sensation of tightness of the shoulder and lymphedema
Time frame: within 6 months after RT
Late radiation associated morbidity
Incidences of fibrosis, dyspigmentation, telangiectasia, edema, arm lymph edema, range of motion of the shoulder, pain, rib fractures, pneumonitis
Time frame: 10 years after RT
Patient reported outcome measures
Rates of patient satisfaction with cosmetic outcome, body image scale, rates of depression and fear of cancer recurrence
Time frame: 10 years after RT
Translational research
Incidences of cardiac disease detected on heart CT scans, PET CT scans, and concentration of early markers of late cardiac events measured in blood samples
Time frame: 10 years after RT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.