Major depressive disorder (MDD) and obesity are major contributors to impaired health worldwide. Statins are among the most prescribed medications with well-established safety and efficacy. Statins are recommended in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, which has been linked to both MDD and obesity. Moreover, statins are promising candidates to treat MDD because a meta-analysis of pilot randomized controlled trials has found antidepressive effects of statins as adjunct therapy to antidepressants. However, no study so far has tested the antidepressive potential of statins in patients with MDD and comorbid obesity. Therefore, we hypothesize that Simvastatin add-on to standard antidepressant Escitalopram will improve depression to a greater extent than add-on placebo in patients with comorbid obesity and major depression. We will randomize 160 obese MDD patients at 8 recruiting centers to either Simvastatin or placebo as add-on to Escitalopram for 12 weeks. If successful, our trial would have immediate impact on clinical practice given the fact that Simvastatin and Escitalopram are available as inexpensive generic drugs with established safety.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
161
12 weeks 40 mg Simvastatin add-on
12 weeks Placebo add-on
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Berlin, Germany
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik
Berlin, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie
Frankfurt, Germany
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Greifswald, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Hamburg, Germany
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Psychiatrie, Sozialpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Hanover, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Leipzig, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Zentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie - Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Lübeck, Germany
Helios Hanseklinikum Stralsund Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik
Stralsund, Germany
Change score in MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg-Depression Rating Scale)
The MADRS is a rating scale to measure depression severity. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. Total score range from 0-60, where higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
Time frame: 12 weeks
MADRS-response
Response is defined as 50% MADRS score reduction at week 12 from baseline.
Time frame: 12 weeks
MADRS-remission
Remission is defined as a MADRS score less than 10 at week 12.
Time frame: 12 weeks
MADRS-MCID
MADRS Minimal Clinically Important Difference represents the smallest improvement that is considered meaningful by the patient. Empirically, the MCID using the MADRS has been identified as a change from baseline between 1.6 - 1.9 at week 12.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change score in BDI-II (Beck Depression Inventory-II)
The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a 21-item validated instrument for the self-report of depressive symptoms, with individual item scores summed to yield a total possible BDI score that ranges from 0-63. BDI scores from 0-13 suggest absent to minimal depressive symptoms, from 14-19 mild symptoms, from 20-28 moderate symptoms, and from 29-63 severe symptoms.
Time frame: 12 weeks
BDI-II-MCID
BDI-II Minimal Clinically Important Difference represents the smallest improvement that is considered meaningful by the patient.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change score in PGIC (Patients' Global Impression of Change Scale)
Participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a scale of 0 to 7; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change score in CGI-S (Clinicians' Global Impression of Severity of Illness)
The CGI-S evaluates the severity of psychopathology on a scale of 0 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, a participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating according to: 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. The CGI-S permits a global evaluation of the participant's condition at a given time.
Time frame: 12 weeks
CGI-I (Clinicians' Global Impression of Improvement )
Clinician rated instrument to measure clinicians' change in overall status on a scale of 0 to 7; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Time frame: 12 weeks
EQ-5D-3L (EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels Questionnaire)
Generic instrument of quality of life related to health. It contains five dimensions of health (mobility, personal care, daily activities, pain / discomfort and anxiety / depression) and each of them has three levels of seriousness (without problems, some problems or moderate problems and serious problems). The second part of the EQ-5D is a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 20 centimeters, millimeter, ranging from 0 (worse health status imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable health status). In it, the individual must mark the point in the vertical line that best reflects the assessment of their global health status today.
Time frame: 12 weeks
SOFAS (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale)
The SOFAS is a rating scale used to determine social functioning; range from 0-100. A higher score represents a better outcome.
Time frame: 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.