The proposed project aims to evaluate the safety of DuraMesh™ suture for laparotomy closure in an emergent setting, while also providing preliminary efficacy data with regard to incisional hernia prevention. Conventional techniques for laparotomy closure in the setting of an emergency laparotomy or delayed abdominal closure suffer from a lack of durability, with incisional hernia rates of 30-34% reported. While prophylactic planar mesh placement has emerged as a cost-effective strategy to prevent hernia formation in the clean, elective laparotomy setting, higher rates of surgical site complications and increased technical complexity preclude its use in the emergency or contaminated setting. Utilized exactly like conventional suture without any change in surgical closure technique, DuraMesh™ provides the durability of planar mesh reinforcement without the marked increase in foreign material or added surgical complexity. As a result, DuraMesh™ is the only hernia prevention strategy that can be forward-deployed in support of the injured warfighter. While this study is specifically targeted to a gap in the care of the injured warfighter, the potential benefits extend well beyond the military applications. With over 2 million laparotomies performed annually in the United States, and approximately 20% of these resulting in an incisional hernia, the need for an alternative abdominal wall closure strategy is equally dire in the civilian setting. This clinical trial represents an opportunity to drive the needed paradigm shift towards prevention, rather than costly management of incisional hernias. The investigators anticipate this work will rapidly lead to further research, including providing the preliminary data necessary to launch a multi-center randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical efficacy of DuraMesh™ for hernia prevention in both the emergent and elective operative settings.
This is a multisite randomized control proof-of-concept trial to evaluate the safety of DuraMesh™ laparotomy closure in the trauma and emergency laparotomy setting. Approximately 120 patients will be randomized (2:1) to DuraMesh™ laparotomy closure versus conventional suture closure. #1 DuraMesh™ will be provided for patients assigned to the DuraMesh™ treatment arm. Patients will participate in a one-year follow-up regime (2 weeks,1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months). Primary Laparotomy Closure Treatment 1) Study Group - DuraMesh™ Laparotomy Closure (DLC) Treatment 2) Control Group - Conventional Suture Closure (CSC) Patients undergoing a midline laparotomy for trauma or emergency surgery will be randomized to either #1 DuraMesh™ suture or conventional laparotomy closure using size #1 slowly-absorbing (PDS) single strand or looped suture, based on surgeon preference. All patients will be assessed for post-operative complications at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients will also be assessed for incisional hernia formation at the same post-operative time points (2 weeks,1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months). Hernia outcomes will be based on physical examination, with ultrasound used for any uncertainties.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Closure of midline laparotomy incision with experimental suture
Closure of midline laparotomy incision with standard suture
University of Maryland Shock Trauma
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Rate of surgical site infection
hematoma, seroma, dehiscence, fistula, bowel obstruction, removal infected mesh suture, return to OR, readmission, mortality
Time frame: 30 days
Intraoperative endpoints
length of surgery procedure, length of hospital stay, length of laparotomy incision
Time frame: day zero, time of implantation
Rate of incisional hernia formation
clinical or radiographic evidence of hernia formation
Time frame: within 12 months
Quality of life patient reported outcomes
SF-36 questionnaire, Scale 0-100, 100 implies no disability
Time frame: 1 month
Quality of life patient reported outcomes
SF-36 questionnaire, Scale 0-100, 100 implies no disability
Time frame: 3 month
Quality of life patient reported outcomes
SF-36 questionnaire, Scale 0-100, 100 implies no disability
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life patient reported outcomes
SF-36 questionnaire, Scale 0-100, 100 implies no disability
Time frame: 12 months
Abdominal wall function patient reported outcomes
HerQles patient reported outcomes for abdominal wall function, Scale 0-100, 100 implies excellent abdominal wall function
Time frame: 1 month
Abdominal wall function patient reported outcomes
HerQles patient reported outcomes for abdominal wall function, Scale 0-100, 100 implies excellent abdominal wall function
Time frame: 3 months
Abdominal wall function patient reported outcomes
HerQles patient reported outcomes for abdominal wall function, Scale 0-100, 100 implies excellent abdominal wall function
Time frame: 6 months
Abdominal wall function patient reported outcomes
HerQles patient reported outcomes for abdominal wall function, Scale 0-100, 100 implies excellent abdominal wall function
Time frame: 12 months
Pain patient reported outcome
Numerical pain rating scale, Scale 0-10, 0 implies no pain
Time frame: 1 month
Pain patient reported outcome
Numerical pain rating scale, Scale 0-10, 0 implies no pain
Time frame: 3 months
Pain patient reported outcome
Numerical pain rating scale, Scale 0-10, 0 implies no pain
Time frame: 6 months
Pain patient reported outcome
Numerical pain rating scale, Scale 0-10, 0 implies no pain
Time frame: 12 months
Visual analog scale pain, patient reported outcome
Wong-Baker faces pain scale, Scale 0-10, 0 implies no pain
Time frame: 1 month
Visual analog scale pain, patient reported outcome
Wong-Baker faces pain scale, Scale 0-10, 0 implies no pain
Time frame: 3 months
Visual analog scale pain, patient reported outcome
Wong-Baker faces pain scale, Scale 0-10, 0 implies no pain
Time frame: 6 months
Visual analog scale pain, patient reported outcome
Wong-Baker faces pain scale, Scale 0-10, 0 implies no pain
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.