Phase IV study to evaluate the effectiveness of additional inhaled sargramostim (GM-CSF) versus standard of care on blood oxygenation in patients with COVID-19 coronavirus infection and acute hypoxic respiratory failure.
Leukine® is a yeast-derived recombinant humanized granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF, sargramostim) and the only FDA approved GM-CSF. GMCSF, a pleiotropic cytokine, is an important leukocyte growth factor known to play a key role in hematopoiesis, effecting the growth and maturation of multiple cell lineages as well as the functional activities of these cells in antigen presentation and cell mediated immunity. Leukine inhalation or intravenous administration, as an adjuvant therapy, may confer benefit to patients with ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) due to COVID-19 exposure, who are at significant risk of mortality. While there is no active IND (Investigational New Drug) for Leukine in the proposed patient population, Leukine is being studied in Fase II as an adjuvant therapy in the management of life-threatening infections to boost the hosts innate immune response to fight infection, reduce the risk of secondary infection, and in varied conditions as prevention of infection during critical illness. Inhaled Leukine has also been successfully used as primary therapy to improve oxygenation in patients with disordered gas exchange in the lungs. We propose that based on preclinical and clinical data, Leukine inhalation, as an adjuvant therapy, has an acceptable benefit-risk for use in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure and ARDS due to COVID-19 exposure, who are at significant risk of mortality. Confirmed COVID19 patients with hypoxic respiratory failure (saturation below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2) will be randomized to receive sargramostim 125mcg twice daily for 5 days as a nebulized inhalation on top of standard of care, or to receive standard of care treatment. Upon progression of disease requiring initiation of mechanical ventilatory support within the 5 day period, in patients in the active group, inhaled sargramostim will be replaced by intravenous sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area until the 5 day period is reached. From day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim, based on the treating physician's assessment. In the control group progressive disease requiring mechanical ventilatory support, from day 6 onwards, the treating physician will have the option to initiate IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area for 5 days. Safety data, including blood leukocyte counts, will be collected in all patients. Efficacy data will also be collected and will include arterial blood gases, oxygenation parameters, need for ventilation, lung compliance, organ function, radiographic changes, ferritin levels, etc. as well as occurrence of secondary bacterial infections.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
87
Inhalation via mesh nebulizer and/or IV administration upon Clinical deterioration
Standard of care
AZ Sint Jan Brugge
Bruges, Belgium
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, Belgium
UZ Brussel
Jette, Belgium
AZ Delta Roeselare
Roeselare, Belgium
Improvement in Oxygenation
Mean Change from Baseline in PaO2/FiO2 on Day 6 or hospital discharge, whichever came first
Time frame: on Day 6 or hospital discharge, whichever came first
Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement
The 6-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement is defined as 1 = Death; 2 = Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation) ; 3 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4 = Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5 = Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6 = Not hospitalized. A higher score represent a better outcome
Time frame: at Baseline, at Day 6
Number of Days in Hospital
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
Number of Participants With Nosocomial Infection no./Total no (%)
Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)
Death
Time frame: at 28 days
Number of Participants Progressed to Mechanical Ventilation and/or ARDS
Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)
Time to Clinical Sign Score < 6 for at Least 24h
Clinical Sign score (0-18) by scoring 6 clinical signs from 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe): Fever (0 = \<37°C; 1 = 37.1-38°C; 2 = 38.1-39°C; 3 = \>39°C) last 24h; Cough; Fatigue; Shortness of breath; Diarrhea; Body pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome
Time frame: During hospital admission (up to 28 days)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change in Clinical Sign Score
Clinical Sign score (0-18) by scoring 6 clinical signs from 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe): Fever (0 = \<37°C; 1 = 37.1-38°C; 2 = 38.1-39°C; 3 = \>39°C) last 24h; Cough; Fatigue; Shortness of breath; Diarrhea; Body pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time frame: at baseline, at day 6
Change in (National Early Warning Score2) NEWS2 Score
The NEWS2 score standardises the assessment and response to acute illness. Six physiological parameters form the basis of the scoring system: respiration rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness or new confusion, temperature. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 20. The higher the score the greater the clinical risk
Time frame: at baseline, at day 6
Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA Score)
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems (respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological systems). Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.
Time frame: at baseline, at day 6
Change in Ferritin Level
Time frame: at baseline, at day 6
Change in D-dimer Level
Time frame: at baseline, at day 6
Change in CRP Level
Time frame: at baseline, at day 6
Change in Lymphocyte Count
Time frame: at baseline, at day 6
Change in Eosinophil Count
Time frame: at baseline, at day 6
HRCT (High-Resolution Computed Tomography) Fibrosis Score
The HRCT fibrosis score is a subjective assessment of the overall extent of normal attenuation, reticular abnormalities, honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis . The HRCT findings are graded on a scale of 1-4 based on the classification system: 1. normal attenuation; 2. reticular abnormality; 3. traction bronchiectasis; and 4. honeycombing. The presence of each of the above four HRCT findings is assessed independently in three (upper, middle and lower) zones of each lung. The extent of each HRCT finding was determined by visually estimating the percentage (to the nearest 5%) of parenchymal involvement in each zone. The score for each zone was calculated by multiplying the percentage of the area by the grading scale score (i.e. 1. normal attenuation; 2. reticular abnormality; 3. traction bronchiectasis; and 4. honeycombing). The six zone scores were averaged to determine the total score for each patient. The score ranges from 100 to 400, higher values represent more fibrosis.
Time frame: at follow-up, 10-20 weeks after day 10 or discharge, whichever comes first