International, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active Control Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Verinurad combined with Allopurinol in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Evidence shows independent associations between hyperuricaemia and the risk of cardio-renal conditions, including heart failure (HF). Serum uric acid (sUA) is also a strong prognostic factor and correlates with other markers of poor prognosis in HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and an estimated 1/2-2/3 of HFpEF patients have hyperuricaemia. HFpEF is a microvascular disease likely partly driven by endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in coronary vessel walls. Uric acid crystals have been identified in coronary vessel walls in some hyperuricaemic patients. Uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1) is responsible for reabsorption of uric acid (UA) in the proximal tubule. Inhibition of URAT1 results in increased urinary excretion of UA and lowering of uric acid in the blood. Verinurad is a novel URAT1 inhibitor in Phase 2 development for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and HF. Verinurad combined with the xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitors (XOI) febuxostat or allopurinol has been shown to lower sUA in patients with recurrent gout in Phase 2 studies by up to approximately 80%. The primary objective of this Phase 2 study is to assess the effect of a combination of verinurad and allopurinol on exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF. The secondary objectives are to assess effect of combination of verinurad and allopurinol in comparison to allopurinol monotheraphy on excercise capacity dwhich will be measured in peak VO2 as well as effect of verinurad and allopurinol compared to placebo and to allopurinol monotheraphy on Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire (KCCQ)-total symptom score (TSS). A sub-study aims to investigate the relationship between UA crystals and inflammation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
159
The treatment will be titrated in 3 steps for target low dose (3 mg), intermediate dose (7.5 mg) and high dose (12mg) of verinurad. Drug: Allopurinol The treatment will be titrated in 3 steps. Low dose (100mg), intermediate (200mg) and high dose (300mg) of allopurinol.
Study treatments will be titrated in 3 steps: Low dose (100mg), intermediate (200mg) and high dose (300mg) of allopurinol
Matching Capsule
Change From Baseline at Week 32 in Peak V02 Consumption in Verinurad + Allopurinol Compared to Placebo (ANCOVA Model)
Mean change from baseline in peak VO2 at Week 32 between the treatment groups was compared using change from baseline (i.e., week 32 value - baseline value) as the dependent variable, treatment as the independent variable and baseline peak VO2 included as covariate. H0: Difference in mean change from baseline in peak VO2 (verinurad + allopurinol vs placebo) = 0 Ha: Difference in mean change from baseline in peak VO2 (verinurad + allopurinol vs placebo) ≠ 0 A hierarchical test sequence was used for the confirmatory analysis of the primary and secondary objectives in order to address the issue of multiple testing and control the Type I error rate at an overall two-sided 0.05 level. Since this was the first test in the hierarchical test sequence and endpoint was not rejected at a two-sided 0.05 level, the testing sequence did not continue.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline at Week 32 in Peak V02 Consumption in Verinurad+ Allopurinol Compared to Allopurinol Monotherapy (ANCOVA Model)
Mean change from baseline in peak VO2 at Week 32 between the treatment groups was compared using change from baseline (i.e., week 32 value - baseline value) as the dependent variable, treatment as the independent variable and baseline peak VO2 included as covariate. H0: Difference in mean change from baseline in peak VO2 (verinurad + allopurinol vs allopurinol) = 0 Ha: Difference in mean change from baseline in peak VO2 (verinurad + allopurinol vs allopurinol) ≠ 0 A hierarchical test sequence was used for the confirmatory analysis of the primary and secondary objectives in order to address the issue of multiple testing and control the Type I error rate at an overall two-sided 0.05 level.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline at Week 32 in KCCQ-TSS in Verinurad+ Allopurinol Compared to Placebo (MMRM)
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item assessment that measures the patient's perception of their health status, which includes heart failure-related symptoms (frequency, burden, recent change), impact on physical and social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and how the patient's heart failure affects their quality of life. The Total Symptom Score (TSS) averages the frequency domain and the symptom burden domain subscales, which each range from 0 to 100. The TSS ranges from 0-100 (higher scores = better health status). Mean change from baseline in KCCQ-TSS at Week 32 between the treatment groups was compared using MMRM analysis, with change from baseline (i.e., week 32 value - baseline value) as the dependent variable, treatment as the independent variable and visit, visit by treatment, and baseline KCCQ-TSS included as covariates. The number analyzed at each timepoint represents the number of subjects with data at each visit.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Matching tablet
Research Site
Granada Hills, California, United States
Research Site
Northridge, California, United States
Research Site
Torrance, California, United States
Research Site
Miami, Florida, United States
Research Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Research Site
Port Orange, Florida, United States
Research Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Research Site
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Research Site
CABA, Argentina
Research Site
CABA, Argentina
...and 48 more locations
Time frame: From baseline to Week 22 and Week 32
Change From Baseline at Week 32 in KCCQ-TSS in Verinurad+ Allopurinol Compared to Allopurinol Monotherapy (MMRM)
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item assessment that measures the patient's perception of their health status, which includes heart failure-related symptoms (frequency, burden, recent change), impact on physical and social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and how the patient's heart failure affects their quality of life. The Total Symptom Score (TSS) averages the frequency domain and the symptom burden domain subscales, which each range from 0 to 100. The TSS ranges from 0-100 (higher scores = better health status). Mean change from baseline in KCCQ-TSS at Week 32 between the treatment groups was compared using MMRM analysis, with change from baseline (i.e., week 32 value - baseline value) as the dependent variable, treatment as the independent variable and visit, visit by treatment, and baseline KCCQ-TSS included as covariates. The number analyzed at each timepoint represents the number of subjects with data at each visit.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 22 and Week 32