This is a prospective, multicenter clinical study designed to facilitate the collection and evaluation of surgical workflow efficiency, patient pain and function outcome and adverse events data. This study might include Persona, Nexgen and Vanguard product families using the ROSA Total Knee Robotic system or conventional instrumentation. The primary objective is to evaluate the accuracy of implant alignment for ROSA Total Knee robotic instrumentation compared to conventional instrumentation.
The main purpose of this study is to collect and compare clinical outcomes data using the commercially available ROSA Total Knee robotic instrumentation and conventional instrumentation. This will be achieved by assessing: planned vs actual component positioning, operative workflow efficiency, patient safety based on incidence and frequency of adverse events, clinical performance measured by overall pain and function, health-related quality of life data and radiographic parameters. The primary endpoint will report on the accuracy of implant alignment for ROSA Total Knee robotic instrumentation compared to conventional and the secondary endpoints will record surgery time points and evaluate the change of clinical outcomes scores between baseline and post operative follow up for performance and clinical benefits
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
252
The choice of intervention is defined by surgeons standard use of device 'Persona' in their standard of care practice
The choice of intervention is defined by surgeons standard use of device 'Nexgen' in their standard of care practice
The choice of intervention is defined by surgeons standard use of device 'Vanguard' in their standard of care practice
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels, Belgium
Herzogin Elisabeth Hospital
Braunschweig, Germany
Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau
Spandau, Germany
The Research Fund of Hadassah Medical Organization
Jerusalem, Israel
San Giuseppe Hospital
Arezzo, Italy
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
Geneva, Switzerland
Alignment Accuracy
Evaluate the accuracy of implant component alignment for ROSA Total Knee robotic instrumentation compared to conventional instrumentation, by measuring femoral rotation in the axial plane using pre op and post op CT assessments.
Time frame: Pre-operative, 3 months
Operative Workflow Efficiency
Measure operative workflow efficiency by recording following time points during surgery: Patient in -and out time, incision - and incision closed time
Time frame: Intraoperative
Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
The OKS is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to specifically assess the patient's perspective of outcome following TKA. The OKS consists of twelve questions covering function and pain associated with the knee. To calculate the total score, each question is scored from 0 (worst outcome) to 4 (best outcome) and the sum of all 12 items is reported with a maximum of 48, representing the best score possible. The outcome score can be categorized as Excellent: \> 41; Good: 34 - 41; Fair: 27 - 33; Poor: \< 27
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) - Score
The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument widely used to measure health status, and it is a self-reported assessment about the patient's quality of life. The questionnaire includes 5 questions referring to mobility, self-care, daily/usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For EQ-5D-5L, each question can be answered in five ways, indicating no, slight, moderate, severe or extreme pain. In the derived EQ-5D-5L score, the highest score is 1 and the lowest score is -0.573; negative numbers correspond to a self-assessed health state worse than being dead.
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) VAS Scale
The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument widely used to measure health status. It is a self-reported assessment about the patient's quality of life composed of two parts: a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS is a vertical scale ranging from 100 ('The best health you can imagine') to 0 ('The worst health you can imagine') where the patient reports his/her self-rated health.
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) Pain
The NRS Pain is an outcome measure of pain intensity in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. The common format is a horizontal bar or line. Scores range from 0-10 points, with 0 representing "no pain" to 10 representing "worst imaginable pain".
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
The FJS-12 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to specifically assess the patient's level of awareness of having a joint prosthesis during daily activities. The FJS consists of twelve questions covering function and pain associated with the knee. For each question, there is a choice of five answers between never (0), almost never (1), seldom (2), sometimes (3) and mostly (4). All scores are summed up and divided by the number of completed items. This value is then multiplied by 25 and thereafter subtracted from 100. An outcome score of 100 (highest possible score) indicates the lowest level of awareness of having a joint prosthesis, while a total score of 0 indicates the highest level of awareness of having a joint prosthesis.
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
Patient Satisfaction - Question 1
Patients were asked to answer the following question: "How satisfied are you with the results of your surgery?" by selecting from the answers: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied.
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
Patient Satisfaction - Question 2
Patients were asked to answer the following question: "How satisfied are you with the results of your surgery for improving your pain?" by selecting from the answers: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied.
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
Patient Satisfaction - Question 3
Patients were asked to answer the following question: "How satisfied are you with the results of your surgery for improving your ability to do home or yard work?" by selecting from the answers: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied.
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
Patient Satisfaction - Question 4
Patients were asked to answer the following question: "How satisfied are you with the results of your surgery for improving your ability to do recreational activities?" by selecting from the answers: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied.
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.