Before deciding on treatment for patients with lung cancer, a critical step in the investigation is finding out whether the lymph nodes in the chest contain cancer cells. This is accomplished with a biopsy of the lymph nodes through the airway wall, known as Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration. Guidelines require that every single lymph node in the chest be biopsied through a process called Systematic Sampling. However, emerging data suggests that the lymph nodes that appear benign on imaging and ultrasound do not need a biopsy. A proposed alternative to the inefficient Systematic Sampling is the simplified Selective Targeted Sampling of the lymph nodes, whereby only lymph nodes that look malignant are biopsied. This trial will evaluate the simplified Selective Targeted Sampling of lymph nodes and compare it to Systematic Sampling to see whether it is equally as effective in staging lung cancer.
Treatment decisions in Non-Small Lung Cancer (NSCLC) are reliant on a thorough staging process that includes imaging with Computed Tomography (CT), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Systematic Sampling (SS) of mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs) by Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Collectively, the results of these staging procedures dictate whether patients will be treated with surgery, radiation and/or chemotherapy. Current guidelines for SS through EBUS-TBNA mandate the biopsy of at least 3 mediastinal LN stations (4R, 4L and 7) in the chest, even if they appear normal on CT and PET scan. Despite improvements in diagnostic techniques and safety, LN biopsies remain onerous for the patient and costly to our healthcare system. SS is also unreliable, yielding inconclusive pathology results in 42.14% of cases, especially for Triple Normal LNs, which are LNs that appear normal on PET, and CT, and EBUS. In fact, SS results in mostly negative or inconclusive biopsies for Triple Normal LNs, which may be due in part to their very low probability (\< 6%) of malignancy. As such, the researchers have proposed to replace the onerous and unreliable process of SS by a simpler Selective Targeted Sampling (STS) staging process. In STS, Triple Normal LNs will not be biopsied, due to the very high negative predictive value (NPV) of malignancy. STS follows the simple notion that only LNs that have the potential to be malignant should be biopsied, whereas LNs which are very likely benign (i.e. Triple Normal LNs) should not be biopsied.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
Mediastinal lymph nodes are assessed with the CLNS, and only those appearing malignant with the score are biopsied. Triple Normal lymph nodes (normal appearing on PET, CT and EBUS) are not biopsied.
All examined mediastinal lymph nodes are biopsied, regardless of whether they appear normal during PET, CT and EBUS.
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
CHUM Endoscopic Tracheo-bronchial and Oesophageal Center
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
MUHC Interventional Pulmonology Department
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Non-Inferiority Margin between Selective Targeted Sampling and Systematic Sampling
A margin of 5% or less would be considered satisfactory for STS to be deemed non-inferior to SS.
Time frame: 2 years
Diagnostic Statistics (between staging methods)
Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value
Time frame: 2 years
Agreement (between staging methods)
Based on Cohen's Kappa statistics
Time frame: 2 years
Inconclusive Biopsy Rate
Percentage of lymph nodes with inconclusive pathology from biopsy
Time frame: 2 years
Diagnostic Yield (accuracy)
Proportion of lymph nodes with a pathological diagnosis for both sampling methods
Time frame: 2 years
Difference in Procedure Length
For each sampling method (in minutes)
Time frame: 2 years
Difference in Cost per Procedure
For each sampling method (sum of dollar costs for EBUS procedure)
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.