The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of ultrasound guided steroid injection versus ultrasound guided steroid hydrodissection to treat patients with CTS.
This study was a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Patients with CTS were randomly treated with sonographically guided corticosteroid injection (group A); sonographically guided hydrodissection and corticosteroid injection (group B). Boston Carpal tunnel questionnaire, nerve conduction studies and VAS pain score were performed on initial visit and after 6 weeks and 12 weeks .
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
60
ultrasound guided steroid injection using 1ml of 10mg triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort) mixed with 1ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine) and 8cc NS
ultrasound guided steroid injection using 1ml of 10mg triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort) mixed with 1ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine) and 8cc NS
ultrasound guided steroid injection using 1ml of 10mg triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort) mixed with 1ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine) and 8cc NS
Taipei veteran general hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
RECRUITINGchange from baseline in the scores on Boston Carpal tunnel Questionnaire (BQ)
The BQ was interviewed-administered to assess the severity of symptoms and functional status
Time frame: 0, 6, 12 weeks.
change from baseline in self reported pain intensity
patient were asked to indicate the intensity of their average level of pain for the wrist-hand region, using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
Time frame: 0, 6, 12 weeks
change from baseline in median nerve distal motor latency
the CMAPs were obtained via surface electrodes placed on the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. The active recording electrode was placed on the muscle belly, and the reference electrode was placed on the tendon insertion. The median nerve was stimulated 8 cm proximal to the active recording electrode. Distal motor latencies were measured from the onset of stimulus artifact to the onset of the CMAP
Time frame: 0, 6, 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in sensory nerve conduction velocity
SNAPs were obtained using an antidromic method and recorded by surface electrodes placed at the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints of the index finger for the median nerve and the same joints of the little finger for the ulnar nerve. The median nerves were stimulated at the wrist at a distance of 14 cm from the wrist to the active electrode. Distal sensory latencies were measured from the onset of the stimulus artifact to the onset of the SNAP. SNCV was calculated dividing the distance of 14 cm by the distal sensory latency.
Time frame: 0, 6, 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.