We aim to assess the benefits and harms of low-dose hydrocortisone in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia.
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) with many patients developing severe hypoxic respiratory failure. Many patients have died, and healthcare systems in several countries have been or will be overwhelmed because of a surge of patients needing hospitalisation and intensive care. There is no proven treatment for COVID-19; the care is supportive, including respiratory and circulatory support. For other patient groups with similar critical illness (acute respiratory disease syndrome and septic shock), corticosteroids are used because they reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and potentially also mortality. Corticosteroids have been used in some patients with COVID-19, but the recommendations in clinical guidelines differ; some suggest their use, others against. Objectives: We aim to assess the effects of low-dose intravenous hydrocortisone on the number of days alive without life-support in adult patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia. Design: Multicentre, parallel-group, centrally randomised, stratified, blinded, clinical trial. Population: Adult patients with documented COVID-19 receiving at least 10 L/min of oxygen independent of delivery system OR mechanical ventilation. Experimental intervention: Continuous IV infusion of hydrocortisone 200 mg daily will be given for 7 days in addition to standard care. Control intervention: Continuous IV infusion of matching placebo (0.9% saline) will be given in addition to standard care (no corticosteroids). Outcomes: The primary outcome is days alive without life support (i.e. mechanical ventilation, circulatory support, or renal replacement therapy) at day 28. Secondary outcomes are serious adverse reactions (i.e. anaphylactic reaction to hydrocortisone, new episode of septic shock, invasive fungal infection or clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding); days alive without life support at day 90; days alive and out of hospital at day 90; all-cause mortality at day 28, day 90 and 1 year; and health-related quality of life at 1 year. Sample size: A total of 1000 participants will be randomised in order to detect a 15% relative reduction in 28-day mortality combined with a 10% reduction in time on life support among the survivors with a power of 85%.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
30
Continuous infusion: 200 mg (104 ml) every 24 hours, Bolus injections: 50 mg (10 ml) every 6 hours, Total treatment duration: 7 days
Continuous infusion: 104 ml every 24 hours, Bolus injections: 10 ml every 6 hours, Total treatment duration: 7 days
Aarhus University Hospital - Dept of Intensive care
Aarhus, Denmark
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
Dept of Infectious diseases, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
Days alive without life support at day 28
Days alive without life support (i.e. invasive mechanical ventilation, circulatory support or renal replacement therapy) from randomisation to day 28
Time frame: Day 28 after randomisation
All-cause mortality at day 28
Death from all causes
Time frame: Day 28 after randomisation
Days alive without life support at day 90
Days alive without life support (i.e. invasive mechanical ventilation, circulatory support or renal replacement therapy) from randomisation to day 90
Time frame: Day 90 after randomisation
All-cause mortality at day 90
Death from all causes
Time frame: Day 90 after randomisation
Number of participants with one or more serious adverse reactions
Defined as new episodes of septic shock, invasive fungal infection, clinically important GI bleeding or anaphylactic reaction
Time frame: Day 14 after randomisation
Days alive and out of hospital at day 90
Number of days alive and out of hospital not limited to the index admission
Time frame: Day 90 after randomisation
All-cause mortality at 1 year after randomisation
Death from all causes
Time frame: 1 year after randomisation
Health-related quality of life at 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Herlev Hospital - Dept. of Intensive Care
Herlev, Denmark
North Zealand Hospital
Hillerød, Denmark
Hvidovre Hospital - Dept of Infectious diseases
Hvidovre, Denmark
Hvidovre Hospital - Dept of Intensive Care
Hvidovre, Denmark
Hvidovre Hospital - Dept of Pulmonary Medicine
Hvidovre, Denmark
Kolding Hospital
Kolding, Denmark
Køge Hospital
Køge, Denmark
...and 4 more locations
Assessed by EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: 1 year after randomisation
Health-related quality of life at 1 year
Assessed by EQ-VAS
Time frame: 1 year after randomisation