The purpose of this study is to test whether children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are impaired in the ability to flexibly adapt brain network organization in response to shifting cognitive demands during the exertion of cognitive control, by assessing changes in network dynamics resulting from stimulant administration in children with ADHD, and how those changes relate to behavioral and symptom improvements. Subjects will be children with ADHD aged 8-12. Subjects will participate in multiple testing sessions that include: diagnosis and eligibility screening, neuropsychological and behavioral testing, and, if eligible, MRI scans and a medication challenge. Children with ADHD who are enrolled in the medication challenge will undergo one MRI scan on placebo and one MRI scan on stimulant medication, counterbalanced and double-blind. Functional connectivity will be measured using functional MRI and innovative graph theoretical analytic tools will be implemented. Network metrics will be related to symptomatology and behavioral testing measures. It is hypothesized that stimulant administration in children with ADHD will increase flexibility in network reconfiguration in response to changing cognitive control demands as compared to when they are on placebo. It is further hypothesized that the degree to which brain network organization is changed will be related to the degree of improvement in cognitive control performance.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
37
A single, low dose of methylphenidate (0.3 mg/kg) will be administered on the drug day.
A matching placebo pill will be administered on the placebo day.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Resting State Brain Network Organization
Assessment of network topology during a resting state using functional connectivity estimates. Modularity will be determined by applying graph theoretical methods to functional connectivity estimates acquired during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans. Modularity is measured on a -1 to 1 scale, with higher scores indicating stronger community structure, or a stronger tendency of clusters of brain regions to separate into distinct, highly interconnected networks with sparse connections across networks. The optimal modularity value depends on the context. For example, during complex tasks lower modularity is better, while during basic, automatic tasks higher modularity is better.
Time frame: 1 to 3 hours after administration of intervention
Task-Based Brain Network Organization
Assessment of network topology during the Go/No-go (GNG) regular and GNG reward tasks. Subjects see a series of sports balls and are told to respond to most balls (go trials), but not to some specific balls (no-go trials). GNG tasks are identical, except in the rewarded task, correct fast go responses and correct withholding on no-go trials are rewarded with 1 cent and 5 cents respectively. Graph theoretical methods are applied to functional connectivity estimates from fMRI scans to determine modularity during each task. Modularity (-1 to 1 scale) measures the degree to which the whole-brain system separates into distinct communities, such that greater modularity reflects stronger community structure, or stronger tendency of brain regions to separate into distinct, highly interconnected networks with few connections across networks. Optimal modularity value depends on context. During complex tasks lower modularity is better, while higher modularity is better for basic tasks.
Time frame: 1 to 3 hours after administration of intervention
Rest-Task Reconfiguration
Assessment of reconfiguration of network topology between the GNG regular task and the resting state and GNG reward task and resting state. In the GNG tasks, subjects see a series of sports balls and are told to respond to most of the balls (go trials), but not to some specific balls (no-go trials). GNG tasks are identical, except in the rewarded task, correct fast go responses and correct withholding on no-go trials are rewarded with 1 cent and 5 cents respectively. Normalized mutual information will be determined by applying the same graph theoretical methods to functional connectivity estimates acquired during fMRI scans for each rest-task pair. Normalized mutual information is measured on a 0 to 1 scale, with higher scores indicating more similarity in network structure across task and rest conditions.
Time frame: 1 to 3 hours after administration of intervention
Drug-induced Normalization
Assessment of how changes in brain network topology relate to improvements in behavioral performance on the GNG regular and reward tasks, in which subjects respond to go stimuli and withhold responses to no-go stimuli. GNG tasks are identical, except subjects are rewarded for good performance on the reward task. Brain measures include change in modularity during rest, GNG regular, and GNG reward (Outcome Measures 1, 2); behavioral measures include change in commission rate, omission rate, and coefficient of variation of response time during GNG tasks (Outcome Measures 5-7). Pearson correlations are used to relate change in brain measures with change in behavioral measures from the placebo to the methylphenidate scans. Positive correlations indicate that subjects with greater change in the brain measure had greater change in the behavioral measure. Negative correlations indicate that subjects with less change in the brain measure had greater change in the behavioral measure.
Time frame: 1 to 3 hours after administration of intervention
Go/No-go (GNG) Commission Rate
Evaluation of commission errors assessed during the GNG regular and GNG reward tasks. In the GNG tasks, subjects see a series of sports balls and are told to respond to most of the balls (go trials), but not to some specific balls (no-go trials). GNG tasks are identical, except in the rewarded task, correct fast go responses and correct withholding on no-go trials are rewarded with 1 cent and 5 cents respectively. In both tasks, commission errors occur on trials on which participants respond to a stimulus ("go" response) when they are supposed to withhold a response ("no-go" trial). Commission errors are scored from 0 (no commission errors) to 1 (100% commission errors), with lower values indicating better performance.
Time frame: 1 to 3 hours after administration of intervention
Go/No-go (GNG) Omission Rate
Evaluation of omission errors assessed during the GNG regular and GNG reward tasks. In the GNG tasks, subjects see a series of sports balls and are told to respond to most of the balls (go trials), but not to some specific balls (no-go trials). GNG tasks are identical, except in the rewarded task, correct fast go responses and correct withholding on no-go trials are rewarded with 1 cent and 5 cents respectively. In both tasks, omission errors occur on trials on which participants do not respond to a "go" stimulus to which they are supposed to respond. Omission errors are scored from 0 (no omission errors) to 1 (100% omission errors), with lower values indicating better performance.
Time frame: 1 to 3 hours after administration of intervention
Go/No-go (GNG) Response Time Variability
Evaluation of response time variability assessed during the GNG regular and GNG reward tasks. In the GNG tasks, subjects see a series of sports balls and are told to respond to most of the balls (go trials), but not to some specific balls (no-go trials). GNG tasks are identical, except in the rewarded task, correct fast go responses and correct withholding on no-go trials are rewarded with 1 cent and 5 cents respectively. Coefficient of variation (standard deviation / mean) will be calculated for response time in GNG regular and GNG reward tasks separately to account for group differences in mean response time.
Time frame: 1 to 3 hours after administration of intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.