The hypothesis of this project is that the injection of an innovative treatment (microfat and dose of autologous PRP) allows to delay knee arthroplasty in patients with knee OA resistant to medical treatment.
Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease in the world and one of the most common causes of pain and functional disability. The incidence of cartilage pathology has grown due to the ageing population, and the increase in sports participation and its associated trauma. The treatment of these cartilage damage is limited and remains a major public health issue. The aim of the medical treatment and intra articular injections consists in reducing pain and improving the knee function in order to limit the sport, professional and social negative impact in the youngest patients. Nevertheless their efficacy remain non predictable in patients. The arthroplasty will be proposed in the final intention. Insofar arthroplasty is a surgical procedure 1 / which presents a potential infectious risk associated with its invasive nature, 2 / it requires iterative revision surgery, especially in young patients given the limited lifetime of the implants and 3 / whose complete postoperative recovery take several months, it seems justified to continue studies to validate effective alternative treatments to delay the use of joint replacements. Recently, the emergence of biotherapy in orthopedics has developed the use of intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Their use has increased substantially and is based on the demonstration that platelet-rich plasma concentrate growth factors, can stimulate cartilage regeneration in vitro and in vivo preclinical models. In humans, recent data from the literature show that these autologous products are very well tolerated. Their scientific evaluation remains difficult in that 1 / indications and surgical procedures are not harmonized 2 / manufacturing processes PRP are not standardized 3 / quantitative and qualitative composition of PRP is rarely documented. PRP administration procedures can be optimized: indeed in that, it is a liquid preparation (platelet suspension), its administration in a interface tissue allows to limit its spread and potentiate its trophic effect on the injured cartilage site. Adipose tissue is the most relevant interface tissue given, because it's a tissue rich in stem cells with full therapeutic potential and is easily accessible by subcutaneous minimally invasive procedure. Thus, autologous microfat (fat removed under local anesthesia by manual liposuction using fine cannulas specific) administered in the synovial capsule, could play the matrix to receive the injection of PRP. The hypothesis of this project is that the standardized injection of an innovative treatment (microfat and dose of autologous PRP) allows to delay knee arthroplasty in patients with knee OA resistant to medical treatment. This treatment, minimally invasive and with economically reasonable cost, would provide a new treatment for second intention. In terms medicoeconomic if this treatment is effective over a period of several years, even in cases where it is necessary to do it one or two times, it would significantly reduce the financial and societal impact of joint replacements.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
30
Articular knee injection of microfat associated with a dose of 3 billions of platelets or associated with a dose of 1 billion of platelets or with saline solution
Louis
Marseille, France
Cartilage relaxation time on MRI T2-mapping at 3 months
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of intra-articular injection of autologous microfat associated with a standardized preparation of autologous PRP, by changes in the cartilage relaxation time on MRI T2-mapping at 3 months.
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post injection
Improved of chondral lesion on MRI
Improved chondral lesions at 3 months and 6 months on specific MRI cartilage sequences (DP FATSAT Axial, Axial T1, T2 mapping): quantitative morphological sequences resolution and qualitative structural sequences.
Time frame: Baseline and 3 and 6 months post injection
Pain
The evolution of pain with the visual analogic scale compared to the initial state (scores at baseline) and the evolution of pain (VAS score) at 1, 3 and 6 months post-injection. Scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximal pain)
Time frame: Baseline and 1 and 3 and 6 months post injection
Responding patients
The proportion of patients not responding to treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and 3 and 6 months post injection
Biologic parameters / clinical efficacity
The correlation between clinical efficacy and dose of PRP administered and dose of growth factors administered.
Time frame: Baseline and 3 and 6 months post injection
WOMAC
The evolution of the functional impact of knee osteoarthritis with the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis score at 1, 3 and 6 months post-injection. Score from 0 to 96 (the worst)
Time frame: Baseline and 1 and 3 and 6 months post injection
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.