This randomized controlled study is designed to test the non inferiority of no attachment of posterior mesh compared to fixation of posterior mesh to the vagina in laparoscopic sacral colpopexy in terms of anatomical correction of the prolapse, post-operative and long term morbidity and rate of recurrence.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
150
pelvic organ prolapse correction with laparoscopic sacralcolpopexy with no attachement of posterior mesh
pelvic organ prolapse correction with laparoscopic sacralcolpopexy with the attachement of posterior mesh to vagina
ospedale regionale Miulli
Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
RECRUITINGcorrection of pelvic organ prolapse
number of women with correction of prolapse mesured in S POP-Q stage during FU visit
Time frame: 1 year
rate of recurrence
number of women with de novo anterior or posterior or central prolapse
Time frame: 1 year
long term outcomes
number of women with nicturia, dysuria, obstructed defecation , urinary incontinence, pelvic pain
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.