Phase-3, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study with blind evaluation of endpoints and intention-to-treat analysis. The general purpose of the study is evaluate the non-inferiority hypothesis for ischemic events and the superiority hypothesis for bleeding events resulting from platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors given as monotherapy in comparison with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the context of the Unified Health System in Brazil.
Based on current scientific evidence, acute coronary syndrome subjects should be treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, which consists of the association of acetylsalicylic acid with an oral antagonist of platelet P2Y12 receptor. Clinical trials have shown that dual antiplatelet therapy reduces ischemic events, despite of increasing the risk of bleeding complications. Because dual antiplatelet therapy has a positive net effect, such an approach is currently recommended by international guidelines and recognized as the therapy of choice for acute coronary syndrome subjects. It is known that the acetylsalicylic acid dose is directly proportional to the bleeding risk. However, so far, all new antiplatelet drugs have been tested and used in association with acetylsalicylic acid for a varying period of time. This study is carried out in such context and intends to evaluate the clinical performance of new inhibitors of platelet P2Y12 receptor given solely, as monotherapy, to acute coronary syndrome patients, to test the hypothesis that an antithrombotic monotherapy with such agents (i.e., acetylsalicylic acid withdrawal) sustains efficacy by preventing ischemic complications while reducing the bleeding potential of this drug dosage regimens. It is a Phase-3, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study with blind evaluation of endpoints and intention-to-treat analysis. Subjects with acute coronary syndrome treated with a successful percutaneous coronary intervention will be enrolled. The general purpose of the study is to test the non-inferiority hypothesis for ischemic events and the superiority hypothesis for bleeding events resulting from platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors given as monotherapy in comparison with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy in the context of the Unified Health System in Brazil.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
3,410
All subjects randomized to the Monotherapy Group will have acetylsalicylic acid discontinued immediately after randomization. Subjects randomized to the Monotherapy Group will be treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel alone until the end of the study, at Month 12.
Hospital de Messejana Dr. Carlos Alberto Studart Gomes
Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
Instituto Cardiovascular de Linhares
Linhares, Espírito Santo, Brazil
Hospital Evangélico de Vila Velha
Vila Velha, Espírito Santo, Brazil
Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória
Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil
Hospital Ana Nery
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil
Composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction or urgent target vessel revascularization.
Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint (non-inferiority hypothesis)
Time frame: 12 months
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding event
Co-Primary Safety Endpoint (superiority hypothesis)
Time frame: 12 months
All-cause death, cardiovascular death and non-cardiovascular death
All-cause death, cardiovascular death and non-cardiovascular death
Time frame: 12 months
Sudden death
Sudden death
Time frame: 30 days
Stroke
Stroke
Time frame: 12 months
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 12 months
Stent thrombosis
Stent thrombosis
Time frame: 12 months
Unscheduled invasive coronary treatment
Unscheduled invasive coronary treatment
Time frame: 12 months
BARC 1-5 type bleeding
BARC 1-5 type bleeding
Time frame: 12 months
Net adverse clinical events (occurrence of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent target-vessel revascularization, BARC 2, 3 or 5 bleeding)
Net adverse clinical events (occurrence of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent target-vessel revascularization, BARC 2, 3 or 5 bleeding)
Time frame: 12 months
Cost-effectiveness ratio
Cost-effectiveness ratio
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hospital de Base de Brasília
Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
Instituto Aramari APO
Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
Hospital Municipal Aparecida de Goiania
Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
CASSEMS
Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
...and 40 more locations