This seamless, adaptive, two-stage, Phase 2b/3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-groups, placebo-controlled study will assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of belapectin compared with placebo in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and clinical signs of portal hypertension but without esophageal varices at baseline.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
357
intravenous
intravenous
Proportion of patients in the belapectin treatment groups who develop new esophageal varices at 78 weeks [18 months] of treatment compared to placebo
Proportion of patients in the belapectin treatment groups who develop new esophageal varices at 78 weeks \[18 months\] of treatment compared to placebo
Time frame: At 78 weeks [18 months]
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop varices (esophageal or gastric) requiring treatment
Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop varices (esophageal or gastric) requiring treatment
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop variceal bleed requiring hospitalization
Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop variceal bleed requiring hospitalization
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop clinically significant ascites requiring hospitalization
Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop clinically significant ascites requiring hospitalization
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Digestive Health Specialists
Dothan, Alabama, United States
The Institute for Liver Health
Chandler, Arizona, United States
Arizona Liver Health - Glendale
Glendale, Arizona, United States
Institute for Liver Health - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Liver Wellness Center - Little Rock
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Hope Clinical Research, Inc.
Canoga Park, California, United States
Southern California GI & Liver Centers
Coronado, California, United States
University of California San Diego Medical Center -La Jolla Multi-Specialty Clinics- Perlman Offices
La Jolla, California, United States
Om Research LLC
Lancaster, California, United States
...and 146 more locations
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven score ≥2 and requiring hospitalization)
Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven score ≥2 and requiring hospitalization)
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop mortality (all-cause)
Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop mortality (all-cause)
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop liver transplant
Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop liver transplant
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥15
Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥15
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin Phase 3 treatment group who progress to large varices (gastric or esophageal) or develop red wales compared to placebo.
Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin Phase 3 treatment group who progress to large varices (gastric or esophageal) or develop red wales compared to placebo
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, progression to large varices or red wales
Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, progression to large varices or red wales
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, esophageal variceal hemorrhage requiring hospitalization
Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, esophageal variceal hemorrhage requiring hospitalization
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, clinically significant ascites requiring hospitalization
Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, clinically significant ascites requiring hospitalization
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, overt hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven score ≥2 and requiring hospitalization)
Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, overt hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven score ≥2 and requiring hospitalization)
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score increase of ≥2 points (from baseline)
Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score increase of ≥2 points (from baseline)
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score increase to ≥15 as measured on 2 consecutive occasions
Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score increase to ≥15 as measured on 2 consecutive occasions
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, liver transplant
Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, liver transplant
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, liver-related death
Event-free survival by time to first cirrhosis related clinical event, liver-related death
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks