Study Title: Changes on the Interproximal marginal bone level after CAD-CAM designed bridges directly placed on bone-level implants, or with intermediate abutments. A Randomized Clinical Trial. * Objectives: To evaluate differences on changes on the interproximal marginal bone level 12 months after the connection of CAD/CAM designed prosthesis with an intermediate abutment (3mm long) or directly placed to bonelevel implants. Secondary objectives will be evaluate changes on the soft tissues and implant survival, as well as patients' satisfaction 3, 6 and 12 months after the connection of the definitive prosthesis. * Design and Outcomes: Randomized double-blinded clinical trial with parallel design to asses the effect of CADCAM designed bridges directly placed * Interventions and Duration: Patients will be selected according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria among those who attend the Unit of Periodontology of the University of Santiago de Compostela. After clinical and radiological implant planning, implant surgical placement will be scheduled. 2 MOZO GRAU® INHEX ST implants, with 3.75 mm or 4.25 mm of diameter and 8mm, 10mm or 11.5mm length will be placed on each patient, according to the bone availability. After 8 weeks of submerged healing, second stage surgery will be performed and definitive impression will be taken. All groups patients will keep a heeling abutment until the definitive prosthesis is placed, 3 weeks later (test group: direct to implant / control group: abutment 3 mm long). Clinical and radiological assessment after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months will be performed. Each participant will be on study about 15 months since the recruitment visit until the end of the study. * Sample Size and Population: Based on previous studies, a sample size calculation determined that a group of 32 subjects, considering possible dropouts, will provide 80% power to detect a true radiographic difference of 0.80mm between groups after 12 months of observation since the definitive prosthesis connection. (Blanco et al 2017, Nóvoa et al 2017). A common standard deviation between groups was calculated (SD=0.715268015). A p ≤ 0.05 value will be considered significant (JM. Domenech \& R. Granero 2010). A balanced random permuted block will be applied to prepare the randomization tables, stratifying for smoking habits (yes/no) with a 1:1 ratio between test and control groups.
Changes on the interproximal periimplant marginal bone level measured as the distance between the bone crest to the first implant to bone contact, using periapical radiographs, will be evaluated. Each patient will receive to implants that will be rehabilitated with an implant supported prosthesis, being the test group a prosthesis connected directly to the implants, while the control group will be a prosthesis connected to the implants through intermediate abutments.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
37
dental prostheses connected directly to the dental implants
dental prostheses connected with an intermediate abutment to the implant
University of Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain
Radiographic Periimplant Marginal Bone Loss
distance in millimetres measured on the periapical radiography between the implant neck and the first bone to implant contact after 12 months of loading
Time frame: 12 months after the connection of the definitive prosthesis
Aesthetic parameters according to papilla refill between the prosthetic units
Using the Jemt index 1997 to evaluate the papilla refill between the prosthetic units
Time frame: 12 months after the connection of the definitive prosthesis
PROM's - Patient Recorded Outcomes Measurements
Visual Analogue Scale from 1 to 10 where the patient can evaluate the treatment according to aesthetics, chewing capacity, phonetics, confort and general satisfaction with the treatment
Time frame: 12 months after the connection of the definitive prosthesis
Adverse events
prostheses fracture, implant fracture, biological complications
Time frame: 12 months after the connection of the definitive prosthesis
probing pocket depth
measured with a CP12 calibrated periodontal probe from the gingival margin to the end of the periimplant pocket
Time frame: 12 months after the connection of the definitive prosthesis
Bleeding on probing
presence of bleeding after probing pocket depth using the Mombelli index 1987
Time frame: 12 months after the connection of the definitive prosthesis
Plaque index
presence of plaque on the implant supported rehabilitation using the Mombelli index 1987
Time frame: 12 months after the connection of the definitive prosthesis
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.