The aim of the study is to demonstrate the superiority of early intra-aortic balloon pump implantation at admission over local clinical practice (pharmacological only) in acute decompensated heart failure patients with cardiogenic shock, with respect to 60-day survival or successful bridge to heart replacement therapies (heart transplant or Left Ventricular Assist Device implantation).
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the most severe form of acute heart failure, with in-hospital mortality up to 50%. Failure to improve mortality has been reported, despite observed improvements in hemodynamics. Previous studies on CS have almost exclusively been focused on CS following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Chronic heart failure patients with acute decompensation (ADHF) and CS represent a unique physiologic phenotype compared with ACS patients, which may lead to a differential response to device therapy. Recent evidences emphasize that intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is not recommended for patients with ACS-related CS, but it is associated with a high likelihood of bridge to durable Left Ventricular Assist Device or heart transplant without the need for escalation to more potent temporary mechanical circulatory support devices, when implanted in ADHF patients. Data retrieved from the available literature in the setting of patients with CS not related to ACS are poor even in large, well-reported registries. Accordingly, Altshock-2 trial has been designed to test the superiority of early IABP implantation at admission over local clinical practice (pharmacological only) in ADHF patients with CS, with respect to 60-day survival or successful bridge to heart replacement therapies
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
IABP implantation within 6 hours since cardiogenic shock symptoms onset
Any agent (inotropes and vasopressors) will be allowed. However, the following guide is provided to increase uniformity: 1) vasopressors allowed will be either epinephrine or norepinephrine; 2) as inotropic agent milrinone or dobutamine or levosimendan could be used; 3) dopamine will be allowed in association with milrinone or dobutamine or levosimendan; 4) the maximum inotropic score allowed will be 20.
ASST GOM Niguarda
Milan, Italy
Successful bridge to heart replacement therapies, namely heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation
Number of participants to heart transplant or Left Ventricular Assist Device implantation
Time frame: 60 days
Survival
Rate
Time frame: 60 days
Renal replacement therapy, namely any need of replacement of kidney function due to renal failure by means of the following techniques: continuous hemofiltration and hemodialysis, intermittent hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis
Number of participants who need a renal replacement therapy among the two groups (early IABP vs standard)
Time frame: 60 days
Maximum inotropic score among the two groups
To compare maximum inotropic score among the two groups (early IABP vs standard). IS (mcg/kg/min) = \[dopamine, dobutamine + 100 x (norepinephrine+epinephrine) +15 x IPDE-3 +10for levosimendan\] (Reference: Int J Artif Organs. 2016 Feb;39(2):94-7)
Time frame: Through study completion, an avererage of 30 days
Maximum duration of inotropic/vasopressor therapy among the two groups
To compare maximum duration of inotropic/vasopressor therapy among the two groups (early IABP vs standard)
Time frame: Through study completion, an avererage of 30 days
Maximum sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA)
To compare maximum sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA)
Time frame: Through study completion, an avererage of 30 days
early IABP vs standard
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
To compare 60-day overall survival among the two groups
Time frame: 60 days