The Effects of Claudication Severity on Functional Outcomes

Overview

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects over 236 million people globally. A classic symptom of PAD is intermittent claudication (IC) which is associated with reductions in physical function. The evidence is irrefutable that supervised exercise programmes (SEP) improve pain free and maximal waking distance. However, adherence rates are poor with exercise-related pain cited as contributable factor. Exercise at mild claudication or pain- free exercise improves walking ability, however current guidelines recommend exercise should be performed to near maximal claudication to improve walking ability. Conflicting evidence exists and there is a lack of evidence that has directly compared the relative effects of exercise prescribed at different levels of claudication. Therefore, the primary objective is to directly compare the effects of exercise prescribed at different levels of claudication pain on functional outcomes

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive disease and is characterised by atherosclerotic occlusion of the arteries in the lower limbs, resulting in a reduction of blow flow. Globally, it is estimated that 236 million people are living with PAD, with the number of cases increasing by 24% from 2000 to 2010 (Song et al., 2019). A classic symptom of PAD is intermittent claudication (IC), which is characterised by ischemic muscle pain precipitated by exertion and relieved by rest. IC is associated with various comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia as well as reductions in physical function, quality of life, and balance. National and international guidelines recommend exercise therapy as first line treatment for patients with IC, advocating two hours per week of a supervised exercise over a three-month period, with patients being encouraged to exercise to the point of maximal pain. Exercise therapy is also a cost-effective option, as a three month programme costs less than a tenth of the cost of angioplasty. However, despite the plethora of evidence demonstrating the benefits of SEP, less than half of vascular units in the United Kingdom (UK) have access one and patient uptake rates low. A lack of motivation has been shown as one of the primary reasons for poor adherence with claudication pain being suggested as a contributable factor. Indeed, exercise-induced pain has been shown as a major barrier to physical activity in this population and the level of pain prescribed during SEP influences completion rates. When exercise is prescribed at higher levels of pain, completion rates are lower. However, current evidence and guidelines advocate exercising to the point of near maximal pain, despite evidence to the contrary, suggesting that mild- or pain-free exercise improves walking ability. As such, it remains unclear which level of claudication is optimal for improving functional outcomes in patients with IC which can affect patient adherence, clinical practice and exercise prescription. The lack of adequately powered, randomised clinical trials investigating the effects of exercise prescribed at differing levels of claudication pain has also been highlighted in a recent scientific statement from the American Heart Association