The spread of cancer to the spine is referred to as spine metastasis. Spine metastases are a common complication of cancer and are frequently associated with significant back pain. This study is being done to help improve treatment for back pain caused by spinal metastases by comparing the effectiveness of two standard treatments. These two treatments include radiation therapy (RT) alone versus radiation therapy combined with radiofrequency ablation, with or without vertebral augmentation (PVA/RFA). In addition to RT or RT with PVA/RFA, will be continued with current pain medications.
All supportive therapy for optimal medical care will be given during the study period at the discretion of the attending physician(s) within the parameters of the protocol and documented on each site's source documents as concomitant medication. The study will be adequately powered with 52 patients (35 in the RT plus PVA/RFA arm and 17 in the RT arm). Assuming a 5% ineligibility rate, a death rate of 15%, and a patient non-compliance rate of 15%, the total sample size required would be 80 patients. Patients will be stratified according to the tumor type (radioresistant \[soft tissue sarcoma, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma\] versus other types). The treatment allocation scheme described by Zelen (1974) will be used because it balances patient factors. Within each stratum, patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either image-guided RT plus RFA/PVA or external beam RT alone. The 2:1 randomization allocation will be used to accommodate increased demand for image-guided RT plus RFA/PVA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
63
30 Gy in 10 fractions of 3 Gy each
Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) / Vertebral Augmentation
Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health South Florida
Miami, Florida, United States
Change in pain control
Change in pain control (as measured by the 11 point Numeric pain rating scale) as compared to conventional palliative radiotherapy alone.
Time frame: 3 months, 6, 12, 24 months
Change in pain response
Change in the rapidity of pain response at the treated site(s) as compared to conventional Radiotherapy alone, as measured by the Numeric pain rating scale.
Time frame: 3 months, 6, 12, 24 months
Measure increases in the duration of pain response
Measure increases in the duration of pain response at the treated site(s), as compared to conventional RT alone, as measured by the Numeric pain rating scale.
Time frame: 3 months, 6, 12, 24 months
Number of adverse events
Number of adverse events between the two treatments according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.
Time frame: 3 months, 6, 12, 24 months
Measure the potential benefit on quality of life
Measure the potential benefit of radiotherapy plus Vertebral Augmentation/Radiofrequency Ablation on change in and overall quality of life, as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General; in pain as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory; and in health utilities as measured by the EuroQol
Time frame: 3 months, 6, 12, 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.