The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in the treatment of participants with COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) who require mechanical ventilation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
211
Placebo administered BID approximately 12 hours apart
Ruxolitinb administered BID approximately 12 hours apart
Percentage of Participants Who Have Died Due to Any Cause
To evaluate the 28-day mortality rate of ruxolitinib 5 mg BID + SoC therapy and ruxolitinib 15 mg BID + SoC compared with placebo + SoC therapy, in participants with COVID-19-associated ARDS who require mechanical ventilation.
Time frame: Study start to Day 29
Number of Ventilator Free Days
Number of days participant did not require mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Study start to Day 29
Number of ICU Free Days
Number of days participant is out of the ICU
Time frame: Study start to Day 29
Oxygen Free Days
Number of days participant did not receive supplemental oxygen
Time frame: Study start to Day 29
Vasopressor Free Days
Number of days without use of vasopressor therapy
Time frame: Study start to Day 29
Hospital Free Days
Number of days Partcipant is out of the hospital
Time frame: Study start to Day 29
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2-point Improvement in the COVID-19 Ordinal Scale
Participants with at least 2-point improvement at Day 15 and 29 based on participant state. The scale ranges from 0-8 with 0 being no clinical or virological evidence of infection and 8 being dead
Time frame: Study start to Days 15 and 29
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Honor Health Research Institute
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Sharp Memorial Hospital
San Diego, California, United States
Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Teradan Clinical Trials
Brandon, Florida, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
Northshore University Health System
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Indiana University Simon Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
...and 26 more locations
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-point Improvement in the COVID-19 Ordinal Scale
Participants with at lest 1-point improvement in clinical status at Days 15 and 29 based on participant state. The scale ranges from 0-8 with 0 being no clinical or virological evidence of infection and 8 being dead
Time frame: Study start to Days 15 and 29
Time to Improvement From Baseline Category to Earliest 1-point Improvement in the COVID-19 Ordinal Scale
TIme to improvement compared to baseline. The scale ranges from 0-8 with 0 being no clinical or virological evidence of infection and 8 being dead
Time frame: Study Start to Day 29
Percentage of Participants With the COVID-19 Ordinal Scale Reported
Clinical status of participant at Day 29 based on participant state. The scale ranges from 0-8 with 0 being no clinical or virological evidence of infection and 8 being dead
Time frame: Study start to Day 29
Change in the COVID-19 9-point Ordinal Scale
Change in the Clinical status of participant at Days 15 and 29 based on participant state. The scale ranges from 0-8 with 0 being no clinical or virological evidence of infection and 8 being dead
Time frame: Study start to Days 15 and 29
Change in SOFA Score
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a scoring system to determine the extent of a person's organ function or rate of failure. The score is based on 6 different scores, 1 each for the respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal, and neurological systems. Each system gets a score from 0 (normal) to 4 (abnormal) and the sum of each score defines the final SOFA score, which 24 is the maximum score (high risk of morality) and 0 is the minimum score (low risk of mortality).
Time frame: from baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 11, 15, and 29
Number and Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Side Effects and Serious Adverse Events
Treatment-emergent AEs are judged as related by the investigator or have a missing causality.
Time frame: Study start to Day 29