The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical response of sirukumab (administered as a single intravenous dose) plus standard of care (SOC) compared to placebo plus SOC in COVID-19.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is an enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) betacoronavirus. Symptoms of COVID-19 infection may appear from 2 to 14 days following exposure, with the spectrum of illnesses ranging from mild symptoms to severe illness or death. The identification of SARS-CoV-2 follows the emergence of 2 other novel betacoronaviruses: SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Current management of COVID-19 is supportive, and respiratory failure from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the leading cause of mortality. While an understanding of the epidemiology and clinical spectrum of COVID-19 is still evolving during the ongoing pandemic, the current knowledge of the disease burden highlights the urgent medical need to develop a treatment. Sirukumab (also known as CNTO136) is a human anti-interleukin (IL)-6 immunoglobulin G1 kappa (IgG1k) monoclonal antibody (mAb). Sirukumab binds with high affinity and specificity to human IL-6 and as a result inhibits IL-6-mediated signaling and the biological effects of IL-6. The study will include a Screening Phase (up to 1 Day), a Treatment Phase (Day 1 to Day 28) and a Follow-up Phase (post Day 28, follow-up phone calls on Week 8, Week 12 and Week 16). Safety evaluations will include monitoring of adverse events and serious adverse events, physical examinations, vital sign measurements, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests, pregnancy testing, and checking of vital status. The entire study duration for each participant will be 16 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
212
MemorialCare Research Miller Children's and Women's Hospital Long Beach
Long Beach, California, United States
Hoag Memorial Hospital
Newport Beach, California, United States
Time to Sustained Improvement of at Least 2 Categories on 6-point Ordinal Clinical Recovery Scale (CRS): Primary Analysis Set
Time to sustained improvement is defined as an improvement of at least 2 categories relative to baseline on the 6-point ordinal clinical recovery scale sustained until Day 28. The 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6) corresponding to below categories, reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: not hospitalized, including participants on low level of oxygen (category 1); Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of At Least 2 Categories Compared to Baseline on 6-point Ordinal CRS
Percentage of participants with an improvement of at least 2 Categories compared to baseline on 6-point ordinal CRS were reported. The 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6) corresponding to below categories, reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: not hospitalized, including participants on low level of oxygen (category 1); Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening.
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality Up to 28 Days
Percentage of participants with all-cause mortality up to 28 days were reported. All-cause mortality included all deaths of participants due to any cause.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Holy Cross Hospital - Michael and Dianne Bienes Comprehensive Cancer Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Great Lakes Clinical Trials
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria
Peoria, Illinois, United States
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Beaumont Health Systems
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
...and 6 more locations
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Time to Sustained Improvement of at Least 2 Categories on 6-point Ordinal CRS: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Set
Time to sustained improvement is defined as an improvement of at least 2 categories relative to baseline on the 6-point ordinal clinical recovery scale, sustained until Day 28. The 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6) corresponding to below categories, reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: not hospitalized, including participants on low level of oxygen (category 1); Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 2 Categories Compared to Baseline on 6-point Ordinal CRS: ITT Set
Percentage of participants with an improvement of at least 2 categories compared to baseline on 6-point ordinal CRS were reported. The 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6) corresponding to below categories, reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: not hospitalized, including participants on low level of oxygen (category 1); Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening.
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality: ITT Set
Percentage of participants with all-cause mortality were reported. All-cause mortality included all deaths of participants due to any cause.
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Treatment Phase)
Percentage of participants with SAEs were reported. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Related Adverse Events (AEs)
Percentage of participants with related AEs were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Severe or Life-threatening, Bacterial, Invasive Fungal, Viral or Opportunistic Infections
Percentage of participants with severe or Life-threatening, bacterial, invasive fungal, viral or opportunistic infections were reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Neutropenia and Lymphocytopenia
Percentage of participants with Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and lymphocytopenia were reported. The laboratory abnormalities were determined as per division of microbiology and infectious diseases (DMID) adult toxicity as Grade 1: mild (transient or mild discomfort \[less than {\<} 48 hours\]; no medical intervention/therapy required); Grade 2: moderate (mild to moderate limitation in activity - some assistance may be needed; no or minimal medical intervention/therapy required); Grade 3: severe (severe marked limitation in activity, some assistance usually required; medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalizations possible); Grade 4: life-threatening (extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable).
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Increased Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Greater Than or Equal to (>=)3*Upper Limit Normal (ULN) Combined With Increased Bilirubin Greater Than (>)2*ULN
Percentage of participants with increased ALT \>=3\*ULN combined with increased bilirubin \>2\*ULN were reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Time to Sustained Improvement of at Least 1 Category on 6-point Ordinal CRS: Primary Analysis Set
Time to sustained improvement is defined as an improvement of at least 1 category relative to baseline on the 6-point ordinal clinical recovery scale, sustained until Day 28. The 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6) corresponding to below categories, reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: not hospitalized, including participants on low level of oxygen (category 1); Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Time to Sustained Improvement of at Least 1 Category on 6-point Ordinal CRS: ITT Set
Time to sustained improvement is defined as an improvement of at least 1 category relative to baseline on the 6-point ordinal clinical recovery scale, sustained until Day 28. The 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6) corresponding to below categories, reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: not hospitalized, including participants on low level of oxygen (category 1); Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Category Compared to Baseline on 6-point Ordinal CRS: Primary Analysis Set
The 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6), reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: (category 1) not hospitalized, including participants on low level of oxygen; Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening.
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Category on 6-point Ordinal CRS: ITT Set
The 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6) corresponding to below categories, reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: not hospitalized, including participants on low level of oxygen (category 1); Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening
Time frame: Day 28
Time From Study Intervention Administration to End of Oxygen Supplementation
Time from study intervention administration to end of oxygen supplementation was reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Time From Study Intervention Administration to Hospital Discharge Among the Surviving Participants
Time from study intervention administration to hospital discharge among the surviving participants was reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Total Length of Hospitalization Among the Surviving Participants
Total length of hospitalization, defined as total duration of hospital stay, among the surviving participants was reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Number of Ventilation Free Days
Number of ventilation free days in participants on invasive mechanical ventilation (IVM)/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at baseline was reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Status as Assessed by 6-point Ordinal CRS: Primary Analysis Set
Percentage of participants with clinical status as assessed by 6-point Ordinal CRS were reported. The 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6) corresponding to below categories, reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: Not hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 1.1); Not hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen (category 1.2); Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening.
Time frame: On Day 7, 14, 21, 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Status as Assessed by 6-point Ordinal CRS: ITT Set
Percentage of participants with clinical status as assessed by 6-point Ordinal CRS (ITT Set) were reported. The 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6) corresponding to below categories, reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: Not hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 1.1); Not hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen (category 1.2); Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening.
Time frame: On Days 7, 14, 21, 28
Total Time on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Total time on invasive mechanical ventilation in participants who were on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline was reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With a Worse Category Relative to Baseline on the 6-point Ordinal CRS
Percentage of participants with a worse category relative to baseline on the 6-point ordinal CRS for at least one of the daily assessment during the reporting period Day 5 and Day 28 were reported. he 6-point ordinal CRS provides 6 mutually exclusive conditions ordered from best (score 1) to worst (score 6) corresponding to below categories, reflects the participant's worst situation on the day assessed. The ordinal clinical recovery scale categories are: not hospitalized, including participants on low level of oxygen (category 1); Hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (category 2); hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen (category 3); hospitalized, on non-invasive pressure ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (category 4); hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (category 5); death (category 6). Higher scores indicated greater worsening.
Time frame: From Day 5 up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Over Time
Percentage of participants with ECMO over time were reported.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to Day 28
Total Time on ECMO
Total time for participants on ECMO was reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Percentage of Alive Participants at Day 28, Week 8, and Week 16
Percentage of alive participants at Day 28, Week 8, and Week 16 were reported. For this outcome measure, at Week 8, data was not collected for participants due to pandemic situation.
Time frame: On Day 28, Week 8 and Week 16
Percentage of Alive Participants That Required Readmission at Week 8, and Week 16
Percentage of alive participants that required readmission at Week 8, and Week 16 were reported. For this outcome measure, at Week 8 and Week 16, data was not collected for participants due to pandemic situation.
Time frame: Week 8 and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With SAEs (Follow-up Phase)
Percentage of participants with SAEs were reported. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: From Week 4 up to Week 16