The aim of the present study is to assess clinically and radio-graphically the regenerative potential of immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp using blood clot and Platelet rich fibrin scaffolds.
30 immature necrotic permanent teeth in patients will be allocated and divided into two groups. Group 1 will be treated by regenerative procedure using blood clot as a scaffold and Group 2 will be treated with regenerative procedures using combined blood clot and Platelet rich fibrin as a scaffold.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
30
Bleeding will be induced in the canal by passing a size 30 sterile K-file 3 mm beyond the apex with the goal of having the entire canal filled with blood to the level of the cemento-enamel junction. Bleeding will be stopped just below the cemento enamel junction. Biodentine will be placed approximately 3-4 mm below the cementoenamel junction.
Platelet-rich fibrin will be prepared by drawing the patient blood into a 10mL test tube without the addition of an anticoagulant. To prevent the blood from coagulating after coming in contact with the glass tube, it will be centrifuged immediately using a table top centrifuge\*\* at 400 g force for 12 minutes. Then platelet-rich fibrin membrane will be placed into the canal space to a level 3 mm below the cemento-enamel junction using hand plugger following the induction of apical bleeding by passing a number 30 sterile hand file 3 mm beyond the apex of the tooth. Biodentine cap will be placed over the platelet-rich fibrin scaffold.
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, Egypt
Subjective pain assessment
The patient will be asked about the presence of any pain or discomfort. Pain severity will be categorized as: no pain - mild pain - moderate pain - severe pain
Time frame: 1 month
Subjective pain assessment
The patient will be asked about the presence of any pain or discomfort. Pain severity will be categorized as: no pain - mild pain - moderate pain - severe pain
Time frame: 3 months
Subjective pain assessment
The patient will be asked about the presence of any pain or discomfort. Pain severity will be categorized as: no pain - mild pain - moderate pain - severe pain
Time frame: 6 months
Subjective pain assessment
The patient will be asked about the presence of any pain or discomfort. Pain severity will be categorized as: no pain - mild pain - moderate pain - severe pain
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of pulp vitality
Pulp vitality will be assessed using thermal and electric pulp sensibility tests
Time frame: 1 month
Assessment of pulp vitality
Pulp vitality will be assessed using thermal and electric pulp sensibility tests
Time frame: 3 months
Assessment of pulp vitality
Pulp vitality will be assessed using thermal and electric pulp sensibility tests
Time frame: 6 months
Assessment of pulp vitality
Pulp vitality will be assessed using thermal and electric pulp sensibility tests
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of root development
Continued root development will be assessed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and compared with the contra-lateral healthy tooth
Time frame: 1 month
Assessment of root development
Continued root development will be assessed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and compared with the contra-lateral healthy tooth
Time frame: 3 months
Assessment of root development
Continued root development will be assessed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and compared with the contra-lateral healthy tooth
Time frame: 6 months
Assessment of root development
Continued root development will be assessed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and compared with the contra-lateral healthy tooth
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of the size of periapical radiolucency
Size of the lesion will be assessed using the periapical index score. The PAI provides an ordinal scale of 5 scores ranging from 1 (healthy) to 5 (severe periodontitis with exacerbating features).
Time frame: 1 month
Assessment of the size of periapical radiolucency
Size of the lesion will be assessed using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Time frame: 1 month
Assessment of the size of periapical radiolucency
Size of the lesion will be assessed using the periapical index (PAI) score. The PAI provides an ordinal scale of 5 scores ranging from 1 (healthy) to 5 (severe periodontitis with exacerbating features).
Time frame: 3 months
Assessment of the size of periapical radiolucency
Size of the lesion will be assessed using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Time frame: 3 months
Assessment of the size of periapical radiolucency
Size of the lesion will be assessed using the periapical index (PAI) score. The PAI provides an ordinal scale of 5 scores ranging from 1 (healthy) to 5 (severe periodontitis with exacerbating features).
Time frame: 6 months
Assessment of the size of periapical radiolucency
Size of the lesion will be assessed using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Time frame: 6 months
Assessment of the size of periapical radiolucency
Size of the lesion will be assessed using the periapical index (PAI) score. The PAI provides an ordinal scale of 5 scores ranging from 1 (healthy) to 5 (severe periodontitis with exacerbating features).
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of the size of periapical radiolucency
Size of the lesion will be assessed using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Time frame: 12 months