The Researchers are trying to determine if there is a difference in blood flow around a wound site when comparing three different types of wound closure techniques.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
147
Randomized assignment to one of three known, effective closure techniques
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGLowest perfusion - 10 Adjacent
Lowest perfusion score per 10 measurements taken along the wound closure as a percentage of perfusion at a standard location (5cm above incision).
Time frame: Baseline
Lowest perfusion - 10 Alongside
Lowest perfusion score per 10 measurements taken along the wound closure
Time frame: At time of procedure
Average perfusion - 10 Alongside
Average perfusion score per 10 measurements taken along the wound closure
Time frame: At time of procedure
Average perfusion - 10 Adjacent
Average perfusion score per 10 measurements taken along the wound closure as a percentage of perfusion at a standard location (5cm above incision).
Time frame: At time of procedure
Lowest perfusion - 20 Adjacent
Lowest perfusion score per 20 measurements taken 1cm on either side of the wound closure as a percentage of perfusion at a standard location (5cm above incision)
Time frame: At time of procedure
Lowest perfusion - 20 Sides
Lowest perfusion score per 20 measurements taken 1cm on either side of the wound closure.
Time frame: At time of procedure
Average perfusion - 20 Sides
Average perfusion score per 20 measurements taken 1cm on either side of the wound closure.
Time frame: At time of procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.