Surfactant administration via thin catheter using a specially adapted video laryngoscope - a prospective, multicenter trial, assessing the feasibility of the VISUAL method (Video Surfactant Administration Laryngoscopy). The study will search for the number of attempts until surfactant is administrated, assessment of the infants' stability during the procedure, duration of the entire procedure, form laryngoscope insertion to surfactant administration.
In this study the investigators intend to assess the feasibility of surfactant administration via a thin catheter using a specially adapted video laryngoscope, with a groove designed to allow insertion of an endovascular catheter without the use of other instruments in the oral cavity (forceps ect.). The laryngoscope is manufactured by Peak Medic Ltd, Natania, Israel. Primary Endpoints 1. \- Number of attempts until surfactant is administrated 2. \- Assessment of the infants' stability during the procedure - saturation, bradycardia, tachycardia. 3. \- Duration of the entire procedure, form laryngoscope insertion to surfactants administration. 4\. Secondary Endpoints 1. \- Need of invasive mechanical ventilation in the next 24 hours. 2. \- Complications reports 3. \- Subjective procedure scale of assessment 4. \- Unexpected pitfalls reports 5. \- Safety assessment of the procedure
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
23
thin catheter insertion between vocal cords under direct specially adapted videolaryngoscopy
Department of Neonatology, Carmel Medical Center
Haifa, Israel
Primary outcome measures
Success for surfactant administration - yes / no
Time frame: 1 year
Secondary outcome measures 1
Assessment of the infants' SPO2 %
Time frame: 1 year
Secondary outcome measures 2
Heart rate during the procedure
Time frame: 1 year
Secondary outcome measures 3
Respiratory rate (breaths per minute)
Time frame: 1 year
Secondary outcome measures 4
number of attempts for vocal cords visualization (number)
Time frame: 1 year
Secondary outcome measures 5
Duration of the procedure (seconds)
Time frame: 1 year
Secondary outcome measures 6
Need for mechanical ventilaton witin 24 hours following procedure (yes-no)
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.