Virtual Reality Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center413 enrolled

Overview

This study will test the efficacy of an evidence-based virtual reality (VR) therapy program as a non-pharmacological supplement for the management of chronic lower back pain. Study participants will be randomized to receive one of three VR programs: Skills-Based VR, Distraction VR, or Sham VR. In addition to a VR headset, all participants will receive a Fitbit Charge 4 watch. Study devices will be delivered to the participant's home with instructions for use via FedEx; participants will receive remote technical support. They will be followed for 90 days and complete Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaires to assess functional status, pain levels, and use of pain medications (including opioids). Participants will also be asked to provide consent/authorization to access medical records from their treating facility.

This is a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for individuals with chronic lower back pain. This study investigates the effect of at-home virtual reality (VR) pain reduction therapies on a set of outcome measures. The primary outcome is Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference version 8. This study will enroll 360 analyzable participants into one of three VR therapy groups. Data collection will occur at home via personal computer or smartphone (iPhone/android), with baseline data collected one week before the intervention is mailed to the patient. Participants will have the VR headset for 90 days. Patients are also sent Fitbit smartwatches to track physical activity.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE

Enrollment

413

Conditions

Interventions

Distraction-Based VRDEVICE

Participants will use the Pico G2 4K VR audio and visual head-mounted device, loaded with the EaseVRx-Distraction software. The Pico G2 4K is a standalone VR headset that comes with an orientation-tracked controller. It does not require a smartphone or personal computer to operate. The device supports 3 degrees of freedom (3DOF) head tracking, has best-in-class optics, and a wide field-of-view. The headset battery requires recharging after approximately 2.5 hours of use. https://www.pico-interactive.com/us/G2\_4K.html

Sham VRDEVICE

Participants will use the Pico G2 4K VR audio and visual head-mounted device, loaded with the EaseVRx-Sham software. The Pico G2 4K is a standalone VR headset that comes with an orientation-tracked controller. It does not require a smartphone or personal computer to operate. The device supports 3 degrees of freedom (3DOF) head tracking, has best-in-class optics, and a wide field-of-view. The headset battery requires recharging after approximately 2.5 hours of use. https://www.pico-interactive.com/us/G2\_4K.html

Skills-Based VRDEVICE

Participants will use the Pico G2 4K VR audio and visual head-mounted device, loaded with the EaseVRx+ software. The Pico G2 4K is a standalone VR headset that comes with an orientation-tracked controller. It does not require a smartphone or personal computer to operate. The device supports 3 degrees of freedom (3DOF) head tracking, has best-in-class optics, and a wide field-of-view. The headset battery requires recharging after approximately 2.5 hours of use. https://www.pico-interactive.com/us/G2\_4K.html

Activity TrackerDEVICE

Participants among all arms will be provided the option to passively wear a Fitbit Charge 4 throughout their 90-day study enrollment period. The Fitbit collects biometric data such as daily steps, heart rate, hours of sleep, stages of sleep, and sleep efficiency.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 13 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Able to provide consent to participate in research 2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 3. Male or female, age 13 or older 4. An ongoing low back-pain problem that has persisted at least 3 months and has resulted in pain on at least half the days in the past 6 months. 5. Ability to comprehend spoken and written English 6. Owns a compatible android or iOS smartphone, or personal laptop or desktop computer (excluding tablets) to complete surveys and has access to email. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Presents with a condition that interferes with virtual reality usage, including history of seizure, facial injury precluding safe placement of headset, significant visual or hearing impairment that impacts ability to see the virtual reality images or follow audio instructions 2. Are being recommended for long-term hospitalization that would require more than three-week stay in the hospital 3. Received surgical procedure within the previous 8 weeks 4. Surgery is planned within the next 3 months 5. Is currently using a spinal cord stimulator 6. Has low back pain attributable to a recognizable, specific pathology, including spinal infection, cancer, fracture, or inflammatory spondylopathies, consistent with the NIH Task force on Research Standards for chronic low back pain 7. Previously participated in a virtual reality clinical trial

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) at Day 30

The primary outcome for this study will be self-reported pain interference using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) version 8a. The pain interference scale measures the consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. This includes the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "not at all" (1) to "very much" (5) with a raw score calculated by a sum of the 8 items ranging from 8 to 40. Results are linked to a T-Score (healthmeasures.net) to standardize the results across a general population (a mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10). PROMIS-PI is positively scored, where higher scores indicate worse pain interference. The difference from baseline is reported as Day 30 - baseline, therefore a negative difference corresponds to improvement of symptoms (reduced pain interference).

Time frame: From baseline to day 30

Secondary Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) at Day 60 and Day 90

One of the secondary outcomes for this study will be self-reported pain interference (PI) using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) version 8a. The pain interference scale measures the consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. This includes the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "not at all" (1) to "very much" (5), with a raw score calculated by a sum of the 8 items ranging from 8 to 40. Results are linked to a T-Score to standardize the results across a general population (a mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10). PROMIS-PI is positively scored, where higher scores indicate worse pain interference. The difference from baseline is reported as Day 60 - baseline and Day 90 - baseline, therefore a negative difference corresponds to improvement of symptoms (reduced PI)

Time frame: From baseline to day 60, from baseline to end of treatment at day 90

Change From Baseline in Pain Catastrophizing Survey Short Form 6 (PCS SF-6) at Day 90.

The outcome for this study will be self-reported pain catastrophizing using the Pain Catastrophizing Survey Short Form 6 (PCS SF-6). Pain catastrophizing is a negative mental set regarding actual or anticipated pain, and includes aspects of rumination, magnification, and sense of helplessness. PCS is a 6-item short form survey that measures rates of high catastrophizing as defined by a score of ≥7. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "not at all" (0) to "all the time" (4) with a raw score calculated by a sum of the 6 items ranging from 0 to 24. The scale is positively scored, where higher scores indicate greater levels of pain catastrophizing. The difference from baseline is reported as Day 90 - baseline, therefore a negative difference corresponds to improvement of symptoms (reduced pain catastrophizing).

Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at day 90

Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety at Day 90

The primary outcome for this study will be self-reported anxiety using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety version 4. This scale assesses self-reported perceptions of fear, anxious misery (worry, dread), hyperarousal, and somatic symptoms related to arousal. Items are rated Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "never" (1) to "always" (5), with a raw score calculated by a sum of the 4 items ranging from 4 to 20. Results are linked to a T-Score (healthmeasures.net) to standardize the results across a general population (a mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10). PROMIS-Anxiety is positively scored, where higher scores indicate worse anxiety. The difference from baseline is reported as Day 90 - baseline, therefore a negative difference corresponds to improvement of symptoms (reduced anxiety).

Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at day 90

Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance to Day 90

The secondary outcome for this study will be self-reported Sleep Disturbance using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance version 6a. This scale assesses self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. This includes perceived difficulties and concerns with getting to sleep or staying asleep, as well as perceptions of the adequacy of and satisfaction with sleep. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "not at all" (1) and "very much" (5), with a raw score calculated by a sum of the 6 items ranging from 6 to 30. Results are linked to a T-Score (healthmeasures.net) to standardize the results across a general population (a mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10). PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance is positively scored, where higher scores indicate worse sleep disturbance. The negative difference from baseline corresponds to improvement of symptoms (reduced sleep disturbance).

Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at day 90

Change From Baseline to Day 90 in Weekly Average Opioid Usage

The secondary outcome for the this study is the change from study baseline to Day 90 in the frequency of self-reported daily opioid use. Participants were asked at baseline and Day 90 "Are you currently taking an opioid pain medication on a daily basis? Yes, No, or Not sure" The number of "Yes" responses and the total number of responses is reported.

Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment at day 90

Virtual Reality Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain

Overview

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes