The VIGIL study was set up at the beginning of the pandemic, in the spring of 2020, at a time when diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 had to be performed according to specific clinical criteria (even if no clinical picture suggestive of COVID had been clearly identified). The management of sick young children (with respiratory tract infection that could be attributed to COVID) by pediatricians (infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, general practitioners, and outpatients) was facilitated by an algorithm whose objective was to help define the indications for SARS-CoV-2 PCR and subsequently for antigenic testing. The current technique of deep nasopharyngeal swabbing (for PCR or antigenic testing) is delicate and difficult in children, and is therefore a serious handicap for community-based screening, especially since infectious episodes are frequent in children. Since then, nasal self-tests that can be easily used in children have been commercialized and have facilitated screening. Because of the similarity between the clinical signs of respiratory tract infections in children, it is often impossible to distinguish between different viral respiratory infections and epidemics may overlap in time. However, the identification of the pathogen is the key to improve management of these infectious diseases. The VIGIL study is therefore continuing, still facilitated by the existence of an active pediatric network existing for 20 years. ACTIV AFPA and GPIP have created networks of hospital and ambulatory pediatricians who actively participate in various observatories https://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(17)31606-2/fulltext To date, these observatories have resulted in the publication of more than 80 articles in international journals (https://www.activ-france.com/fr/publications).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
12,000
ACTIV network
Créteil, France
RECRUITINGPARI network
Créteil, France
RECRUITINGPercentage of children screened with a positive PCR result or a positive Rapid Antigenic Diagnostic (RAD) test
Number of positive PCR result or a positive Rapid Antigenic Diagnostic (RAD) test on total number of PCR
Time frame: At inclusion
Number of symptomatic children
Number of positive PCR result in the sick child in the presence of a Covid contagion in the family environment or not on total number of PCR
Time frame: the day of PCR or RAD result
presence or absence of positive people in close contacts
Number of RAD-Sars-CoV-2 positive in the sick child in the presence of a Covid contagion in the family environment or not on number of negative RAD-Sars-CoV-2
Time frame: the day of PCR or RAD result
Percentage of RAD RSV and Flu positive in children with respiratory tract infection
Number of RAD RSV and Flu positive in children with respiratory tract infection on total number of tests
Time frame: the day of PCR or RAD result
Accuracy of antigen test compared to PCR
Sensibility and specificity of the test
Time frame: the day of PCR or RAD result
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.