Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT) Versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) Versus Lay Open Technique

Mansoura University60 enrolled

Overview

Aim of the work To compare Sinus Laser closure versus lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Pilonidal Sinus

Interventions

Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open techniquePROCEDURE

Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique in sacrococcygeal Pilonidal sinus treatment

Eligibility

Sex: ALL

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * patients with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus . Exclusion Criteria: * Abscess formation * Immunodeficiency. * Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits. * Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention. . Pregnant females.

Locations (1)

Mansoura University

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

RECRUITING

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Recurrence

Recurrence of pilonidal sinus after treatment

Time frame: one year

Central Contacts

Mohamed Arnouse

CONTACT

01099222561 drmhamdy@mans.edu.eg

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.