A study designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of crovalimab compared with eculizumab in participants with PNH who have not been previously treated with complement inhibitor therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
210
Dosing depends on body weight. Participants will be dosed as follows: * 5 kg to \< 12 kg: 100 mg IV on Week 1 Day 1 (W1D1); 85 mg SC on Week 1 Day 2 (W1D2) and Q2W from Week 3 until end of study * 12 kg to \< 20 kg: 200 mg IV on W1D1; 85 mg SC on W1D2, Weeks 2, 3 and 4; 170 mg SC, Q2W from Week 5 until end of study * 20 kg to \< 30 kg: 300 mg IV on W1D1; 85 mg SC on W1D2, Weeks 2, 3 and 4; 340 mg SC, Q4W from Week 5 until end of study * 30 kg to \< 40 kg: 400 mg IV on W1D1; 170 mg SC on W1D2, Weeks 2, 3 and 4; 510 mg SC, Q4W from Week 5 until end of study * 40 kg to \< 100 kg: 1000 mg IV on W1D1; 340 mg SC W1D2, Weeks 2, 3 and 4; 680 mg SC, Q4W from Week 5 until end of study * 100 kg: 1500 mg IV on W1D1; 340 mg SC W1D2, Weeks 2, 3 and 4; 1020 mg SC, Q4W from Week 5 until end of study.
Eculizumab will be administered as specified in the respective arm.
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Avoidance (TA)
TA is defined as participants who are packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion-free and do not require transfusion per protocol-specified guidelines. 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for percentage of participants with TA was calculated using the Wilson's method with continuity correction. Participants who withdrew before Week 25 were deemed to have had a transfusion. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 25
Percentage of Participants With Hemolysis Control Measured by LDH
A Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) was used to estimate the population-average percentage of the participants with hemolysis control (measured by LDH ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)) from Week 5 to Week 25 taking account of the intra-patient and inter-patient correlation between LDH control statuses across visits. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.
Time frame: Week 5 to Week 25
Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis (BTH)
BTH was defined as at least one new or worsening symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, shortness of breath \[dyspnea\], anemia \[hemoglobin \< 10 grams per deciliter (g/dL)\], major adverse vascular event \[MAVE, including thrombosis\], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction) in the presence of elevated LDH ≥2xULN after a prior LDH reduction to ≤1.5xULN from the start of study treatment. 95% CI for percentage of participants with BTH was calculated using the Wilson's method with continuity correction. Participants who withdrew before Week 25 were deemed to have experienced a BTH event. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 25
Percentage of Participants With Stabilization of Hemoglobin
Stabilized hemoglobin is defined as avoidance of a \>= 2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from baseline, in the absence of transfusion. 95% CI for percentage of participants with stabilized hemoglobin was calculated using the Wilson's method with continuity correction. Participants who withdrew before Week 25 were deemed to not have had hemoglobin stabilization. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Organizacion Medica de Investigacion (OMI)
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
Centro Integrado de Oncologia de Curitiba
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
*X*CEPHO - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas em Hematologia e Oncologia
Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil
Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo
São Paulo, Brazil
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, China
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, China
The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, China
Jiangsu Province Hospital
Nanjing, China
Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
Nantong, China
Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, China
...and 53 more locations
Time frame: Baseline to Week 25
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Assessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale
Fatigue was assessed using FACIT-F scale. FACIT-F is a self-assessment questionnaire with a 7-day recall period and 13 items evaluating fatigue and its impact on daily life activities. Items are scored on a response scale that ranges from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much so"). Relevant items are reverse scored, and all the items are summed to create a total score range from 0 to 52, with 0 being the worst possible score and 52 being the best possible score. A higher score indicates low fatigue severity. A positive mean change indicates improvement. FACIT-F was assessed in adult participants only.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 25
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. AEs are reported based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 5.0.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Percentage of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions, Infusion-Related Reactions, Hypersensitivity and Infections (Including Meningococcal Meningitis)
An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product or other protocol-imposed intervention, regardless of attribution. Injection-site reactions or infusion-related reaction are AEs related to the injection site that occur during or within 24 hours after study drug administration that are judged to be related to the study drug injection.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Percentage of Participants With AEs Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. AEs are reported based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 5.0.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Manifestations of Drug-Target-Drug Complex (DTDC) Formation Amongst Participants Who Switched to Crovalimab Treatment From Eculizumab Treatment
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Serum Concentrations of Crovalimab And Eculizumab Over Time
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Crovalimab Antibodies
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Change in Pharmacodynamic (PD) Biomarkers Including Complement Activity (CH50) Over Time
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Change Over Time in Free C5 Concentration in Crovalimab-Treated Participants
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Observed Value in Reticulocyte Count (Count/Milliliters [mL])
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Observed Value in Haptoglobin (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL])
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Change From Baseline in Absolute Reticulocyte Count
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 Week 1, Week 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23 and 25
Change From Baseline in Free Hemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, and 25
Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 15, 17, 21, and 25