Non-randomized, single arm, open label, academic observational study of CGuard MicroNet covered stent system use to achieve endovascular lumen reconstruction in carotid artery aneurysms with indications for treatment (enlarging and/or dissecting / symptomatic). Jagiellonian University Medical College research project.
Carotid artery aneurysm (CAA) is a relatively infrequent, but significant clinical condition with numerous diagnostic and therapeutic implications. CAA affects laminal flow in the carotid artery implicating the risk of thrombus formation in the aneurysm cavity, and subsequent ischemic stroke from distal embolization. Another important clinical problem related to the CAA is a possible aneurysm dissection and rupture. Symptomatic CAA and increasing dimensions of CAA institute unquestioned indications for the CAA treatment. Surgical carotid aneurysm repair bears a significant risk (periprocedural stroke, cranial nerve damage, carotid artery ligation). Therefore endovascular techniques of CAA exclusion were developed. Covered stents, stent-grafts, and combined stenting and aneurysm embolization with coils were applied. However, covered stents were demonstrated to increase the restenosis risk, and other complications such as CAA neck endo-leak. Newer technique involves the flow diversion by implantation of stent in dense-structured stent (such as Wallstent) or stent-in-stent implantation. In this case a luminary flow dominates over aneurysm filling, which is limited by stent structure. Gradual thrombosis and occlusion of aneurysm cavity and healing of aneurysm follows.This method disadvantage was related to necessity of double stent load and increased restenosis risk (double metal layer). These issues were addressed only recently by the double layer mesh stents that demonstrate natural flow diverting capabilities. CGuard Stent system is a self-expandable stent covered with PET mesh (MicroNet) that prevents plaque protrusion into the vessel lumen. In addition, in low flow conditions MicroNet can act as the flow diverter. These stents are routinely implanted in elevated risk plaques in high reference centers in Europe. Several published observations indicate the CGuard stent also demonstrates flow-diverting capabilities, but the systematic observation of such application was not performed. C-HEAL is a non-randomized, single arm, open label academic observational study of CGuard stent implantation in carotid arteries in patients with symptomatic, dissecting or enlarging carotid artery aneurysm. Procedures are performed according to the center routine, with application of proximal or distal embolic protection device (if feasible), and standard pharmacotherapy according to the current guidelines.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
25
CGuard stent implantation in the carotid artery with symptomatic, dissecting or enlarging aneurysm
Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, The John Paul II Hospital
Krakow, Maloplska, Poland
RECRUITINGRate of successful aneurysm exclusion
Successful aneurysm cavity exclusion and endovascular lumen reconstruction on routine, non-invasive CT angiography
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of procedural success
Procedural success defined as: Technical success (successful MicroNet covered stent delivery and implantation with complete aneurysm necks coverage) and Clinical success (no complications)
Time frame: Peri-procedural
Rate of In-hospital MACNE (major adverse cardiac and neurological events)
In-hospital MACNE (death, stroke, myocardial infarction)
Time frame: 48 hrs or until discharge
MACNE at 30 days
MACNE at 30 days (death, stroke, myocardial infarction)
Time frame: 30 days
Number of peri-procedural complications
Any complications occurring up to 48 hours post procedure
Time frame: 48 hrs or until discharge
Rate of clinical efficacy at 6 months
Clinical efficacy defined as successful aneurysm exclusion and no procedure related complications
Time frame: 6 months
Rate of clinical efficacy at 12 months
Clinical efficacy defined as successful aneurysm exclusion and no procedure related complications
Time frame: 12 months
Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in the target vessel segment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in ultrasound evaluation of target vessel segment (if amenable to duplex Doppler examination)
Time frame: 6 months
Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in target vessel segment
Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in ultrasound evaluation of target vessel segment (if amenable to duplex Doppler examination)
Time frame: 12 months
Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in target vessel segment
Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) in ultrasound evaluation of target vessel segment (if amenable to duplex Doppler examination)
Time frame: 24 months