The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the antitumor activity and safety of lenvatinib (MK-7902/E7080) in children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed or refractory solid malignancies after administration. Participants were enrolled into Ewing sarcoma (EWS), rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), high-grade glioma (HGG), diffuse midline glioma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, and Other Solid Tumors Excluding Osteosarcoma, diffuse midline glioma, medulloblastoma, and ependymoma cohorts.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
127
Lenvatinib capsules administered orally at 14 mg/m\^2 QD
Objective Response Rate (ORR) At Week 16 Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) or Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria (for High Grade Glioma [HGG] Only), by Investigator Assessment
ORR at Week 16 was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters \[SOD\] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1 at 16 Weeks. For participants with HGG, response was assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: sum of products of diameters \[SPD\] decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to 16 weeks
ORR Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO Criteria (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1. For participants with HGG, response was assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall RANO response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment
PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first administration of study drug until the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG) or death (whichever occurs first).
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Best Overall Response (BOR) Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Children's Hospital of Colorado ( Site 0110)
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Cleveland Clinic ( Site 0119)
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt ( Site 0102)
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center ( Site 0107)
Dallas, Texas, United States
Hospital Universitario Austral ( Site 0126)
Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Hospital de Niños Ricardo Gutiérrez ( Site 0125)
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina
Sydney Children's Hospital ( Site 0801)
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
Queensland Children s Hospital ( Site 0804)
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Royal Childrens Hospital Melbourne ( Site 0802)
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Perth Children s Hospital ( Site 0803)
Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
...and 39 more locations
BOR is defined as the participant's best confirmed response (CR or PR) over the treatment period as assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1 or RANO. As per RECIST 1.1, CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. For participants with HGG, response will be assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall RANO response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment
DOR was defined as the time from the date of the first documented CR or PR to the date first documentation of progressive disease or death (whichever occurs first). As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. For participants with HGG, response will be assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall RANO response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment
DCR was defined as a BOR of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD). To be assigned a BOR of SD, the time from the first administration of study drug until the date of documented SD should be ≥7 weeks. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, and SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. For participants with HGG, response was assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall response was based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value and SD: SPD \<50% decreased from baseline, but \<25% increased from nadir) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG Only), by Investigator Assessment
CBR was defined as a BOR of CR or PR, or durable SD (Duration of SD should be ≥23 weeks since the first dose of the study treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD and SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. For participants with HGG, response is assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall response was based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value and SD: SPD \<50% decreased from baseline, but \<25% increased from nadir) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is reported.
Time frame: Up to approximately 50 months
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is reported.
Time frame: Up to approximately 38 months
Palatability Questionnaire For Lenvatinib Suspension Formulation: Participant Responses by Taste Category
A hedonic Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the supplemental Statistical Analysis Plan (sSAP), all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the taste category is presented.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days)
Palatability Questionnaire For Lenvatinib Suspension Formulation: Participant Responses by Appearance Category
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the appearance category is presented.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days)
Palatability Questionnaire For Lenvatinib Suspension Formulation: Participant Responses by Smell Category
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the smell category is presented.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days)
Palatability Questionnaire For Lenvatinib Suspension Formulation: Participant Responses by Mouth Feel Category
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the mouth feel category is presented.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days)
Palatability Questionnaire For Lenvatinib Suspension Formulation: Participant Responses by Overall Acceptability Category
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the overall acceptability category is presented.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days)
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Lenvatinib at Steady State (AUCss)
Blood samples were taken predose and at specified times postdose on Days 1-28 to determine the AUCss of Lenvatinib.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (0.5-4 and 6-10 hours post-dose), Cycle 1 Day 15 (pre-dose, 0.5-4, and 6-10 hours post-dose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (pre-dose and 2-12 hours post-dose). A cycle is 28 days.