It is hypothesized that a strategy using prophylactic oral and intravenous Tranexamic Acid (TXA) with therapeutic platelet transfusions (if required) is safe and more effective than prophylactic platelet transfusions in patients undergoing an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT).
In Canada, over 1,500 autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (ASCT) are performed annually for hematologic malignancies. It is currently standard practice to provide a prophylactic transfusion of platelets to prevent bleeding when the daily measured platelet count is less than 10 x 109/L. A patient may require up to six adult platelet doses during the post-transplant period. However, the true benefit of prophylactic platelet transfusions in the ASCT setting is unclear and has been called into question by several recent studies. Prophylactic platelet transfusions may not only be unnecessary, they may be detrimental to the patient. Among blood products, platelet transfusions are associated with the highest risk of both infectious and non-infectious complications: this would include bacterial infections and allergic /febrile reactions. Moreover, the potential overuse of platelet products places a significant burden on a scarce health care resource that is provided through volunteer donations. An alternative strategy to prevent bleeding and reduce the need for platelet transfusions involves administering Tranexamic Acid, an antifibrinolytic agent to stabilize blood clots and reduce bleeding. Tranexamic Acid is safe and effective in many clinical scenarios, and may be a reasonable alternative for prophylactic platelet transfusions. In the setting of ASCT, Tranexamic Acid may reduce bleeding and further enhance a strategy of therapeutic platelet transfusions where platelets are administered only in the event of active bleeding symptoms. The effect of prophylactic platelet transfusions and Tranexamic Acid on clinical, quality of life and economic outcomes in patients receiving ASCT is unknown. The primary aim of this research program is to perform a randomized controlled trial to determine whether a strategy of prophylactic Tranexamic Acid (with therapeutic platelet transfusions) is safe and effective compared to prophylactic platelet transfusions in patients undergoing ASCT. A pilot trial demonstrated feasibility by successfully recruiting 100 patients and these patients will be rolled over into the phase III study. The treatment assignment and bleeding outcomes for these patients remain blinded.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
662
Patients allocated to the prophylactic Tranexamic Acid group will receive a standardized routine oral or intravenous dose of Tranexamic Acid 1 gram three times daily. Tranexamic Acid will start when Platelet count is less than 50 x 109/L and continue until platelet engraftment. Patients in this group will not receive routine prophylactic platelet transfusions. Subjects unable to swallow oral Tranexamic Acid pills may have the tablets crushed, administered via nasogastric (NG) tube or the medication will be administered intravenously.
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
RECRUITINGCross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
RECRUITINGWHO (World Health Organization) bleeding events of Grade 2 or higher
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days
WHO bleeding events of Grade 3 or 4
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days
Time from randomization to bleeding of WHO events Grade 2 or higher
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days
Number of days with bleeding of WHO bleeding events Grade 2 or higher
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days
Bleeding Severity Measurement Scale (BSMS) for bleeding events Grade 2 or higher
The BSMS scale measures bleeding grade and classification from 0-2. 0 indicates no bleeding. Grade 1 bleeding consists of trace bleeding and mild bleeding and is not clinically significant. Grade 2 bleeding consists of serious bleeding, serious bleeding causing significant morbidity, and fatal bleeding. Grade 2 bleeding is clinically significant.
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days
Number of platelet and/or red blood cell transfusions
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days
Adverse reactions related to tranexamic acid
Number and type of reactions will be recorded.
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days.
Venous thromboembolism grade 2 or higher
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days.
Adverse reactions related to platelet transfusion
Number and type of reactions will be recorded.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Eastern Regional Health Authority
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
RECRUITINGMemorial University
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGDalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHamilton Health Sciences - Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGLondon Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGThe Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGNiagara Health System
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
WITHDRAWN...and 2 more locations
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days.
Time to platelet count recovery
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days.
Number of days with a platelet count < 10 x 109/L
Time frame: Daily, up to 30 days.
LOS (Length of hospital stay)
LOS = admission date - discharge date
Time frame: LOS will be measured as the number of days elapsed between hospital admission and hospital discharge date up to 30 days.
Transplant related outcome: Bearman Scoring System for Organ Toxicity following HSCT
This is a validated scoring system to assess toxicity during HSCT. In this system, grade I toxicity is reversible without treatment and grade 2 is not life threatening, but requires treatment. Grade 3 requires life-support intervention and grade 4 is fatal. Regimen-related toxicity in each organ system was scored as the highest grade achieved in that organ system through day 28, except that deaths occurring after day 28 as a result of regimen-related toxicity occurring before day 28 are also scored as grade 4. Adverse events that could be attributed to infection (culture-documented), bleeding or other medications are not scored as regimen-related toxicity. The maximum toxicity is the highest grade recorded in any individual organ system and the cumulative toxicity score is the sum of the highest grades recorded for all eight organ systems.
Time frame: Day 30
Transplant related outcome: Incidence of infections at Day 30 following ASCT
Time frame: Day 30
Transplant related outcome: Mortality at Day 30 and 180
Time frame: Day 30, Day 180
Economic Analyses
Incremental cost effectiveness ratios
Time frame: 5 years
Quality of Life Measure: FACT-Thrombocytopenia 18
The FACT consists of 5 subscales that measure physical well-being, functional well-being, social/family well-being and emotional well-being. The BMT subscale of the FACT includes additional items specifically designed to test quality of life and symptoms specific to transplant patients.
Time frame: Weekly, up to 30 days
Quality of Life Measure: FACT- BMT
The FACT-BMT scale is valid and sensitive to clinical change in transplant recipients. It is the most consistently used scale amongst the Canadian Bone Marrow Transplant Group (CBMTG). It is the preferred scale in several Canadian multicentre trials in stem cell transplantation. FACT- Thrombocytopenia 18 is valid measure to elicit quality of life due to thrombocytopenia, and will complement the FACT-BMT scale.
Time frame: Day 30, Day 90, Day 180
Quality of Life Measure: GAD-7
GAD-7 is a short validated scale that assesses symptoms of generalized anxiety and is commonly used in medical settings. There is no specific validated scale to assess anxiety of patients who are at risk for bleeding.
Time frame: Weekly, up to 30 days
Quality of Life Measure: EQ-5D
EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. It is applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments; it provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status that can be used in the clinical and economic evaluation of health care. It is cognitively undemanding, taking only a few minutes to complete.
Time frame: Weekly, up to 30 days