The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of low-dose dasiglucagon (Zealand Pharma, Denmark) to oral carbohydrate consumption for prevention of s.c. insulin-induced hypoglycemia in CSII- and MDI-treated people with type 1 diabetes.
Near-normalization of blood glucose levels through intensive insulin therapy has shown to reduce the risk of diabetes late complications, but the approach is associated with two major side effects: hypoglycemia and weight gain. Although management of hypoglycemia through oral carbohydrate consumption is generally effective, the approach can lead to excessive carbohydrate intake and cause rebound hyperglycemia. It has previously been demonstrated that subcutaneous (s.c.) low-dose glucagon can be utilized to effectively treat mild hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes. However, the instability in aqueous solution of currently available glucagon and the need for reconstitution with sterile water immediately prior to administration has limited its clinical role outside emergency settings. Due to the stability and ready-to-use formulation, dasiglucagon does not hold the limitations known for the currently available glucagon preparations. The aim of this randomized, partially single-blinded, three-arm cross-over study is to compare the efficacy of low-dose dasiglucagon (80 and 120 μg) to oral carbohydrate (15 g) consumption for prevention of s.c. insulin-induced hypoglycemia in CSII- and MDI-treated people with type 1 diabetes. On each study visit (separated by ≥ 3 days), an initial insulin bolus will be administered (at t = 0) aiming for a plasma glucose (PG) level of 3.0 mmol/l. When reaching 4.5 mmol/l, the intervention (s.c. dasiglucagon or oral carbohydrates) will be administered (t-intervention = 0), whereafter PG will me monitored for an additional 180 min.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
20
Abdominal s.c. administration
Oral administration
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
Gentofte Municipality, Denmark
Difference between study visits in time (min) in hypoglycemia (plasma glucose < 3.9 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incidence rate of hypoglycemia (plasma glucose < 3.9 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incidence rate of level 2 hypoglycemia (plasma glucose < 3.0 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incidence rate of rebound hyperglycemia (plasma glucose > 10 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in nadir plasma glucose concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in peak plasma glucose concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incremental peak in plasma glucose concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Difference between study visits in mean plasma glucose concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (min) from intervention to first increase in plasma glucose concentration of 1.1 mmol/l
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in plasma glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (min) to peak plasma glucose concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (min) in range (plasma glucose ≥ 3.9 mmol/l and 10.0 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (min) in hyperglycemia (plasma glucose > 10 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (%) in hypoglycemia (plasma glucose < 3.9 mmol/l) (per protocol) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incidence rate of rescue carbohydrate administration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (min) to rescue carbohydrate administration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in plasma dasiglucagon Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in peak plasma dasiglucagon concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time to peak plasma dasiglucagon concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in serum insulin concentration at visit start (t = 0) and immediately before administration of the intervention (t-intervention = 0)
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in serum insulin AUC from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in dose (units) of insulin bolus at study start (t = 0)
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in change in Edinburgh Hypoglycemia Symptoms Scale (EHSS) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in change in visual analogue scale (VAS) for nausea, headache, stomach ache, injection site pain, palpitations and hunger from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incidence rate of vomiting from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)