A randomized, phase II study comparing the sequences of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil, after failure of standard therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Multicenter, international, comparative, randomized, open-label, phase II study conducted in two parallel groups. The study population will consist of male and female patients aged ≥18 years old with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of fluoropyrimidine-, irinotecan-, and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies, as well as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in patients eligible for these treatments. Patients will be randomized according to a 1:1 ratio to treatment arms A and B. * Arm A: regorafenib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, followed by trifluridine/tipiracil until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. * Arm B: trifluridine/tipiracil until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, followed by regorafenib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
234
REGORAFENIB 160 mg per day during 3 weeks followed by 1 week off of each 4-week cycle except for cycle 1. During first cycle: dose is started at 80 mg per day at week 1, 120 mg per day at week 2, 160 mg per day at week 3, followed by 1 week off. Then TRIFLURIDINE/TIPIRACIL 35 mg/m² Dose administered orally twice daily on Days 1 to 5 and Days 8 to 12 of each 4-week cycle.
TRIFLURIDINE/TIPIRACIL 35 mg/m² Dose administered orally twice daily on Days 1 to 5 and Days 8 to 12 of each 4-week cycle. Then REGORAFENIB 160 mg per day during 3 weeks followed by 1 week off of each 4-week cycle except for cycle 1. During first cycle: dose is started at 80 mg per day at week 1, 120 mg per day at week 2, 160 mg per day at week 3, followed by 1 week off.
To evaluate the feasibility of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R)
The feasibility of the treatment sequence is defined as the percentage of subjects able to receive both regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil according to the sequence in 3rd and 4th line. Subjects will be considered as having received both 3rd and 4th lines if they are administered at least two cycles of each line of therapy, i.e. percentage of patients being treated until the first tumor evaluation.
Time frame: Expected duration of 5 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of Overall Survival rate
Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time interval from randomization until death from any cause.
Time frame: Expected duration of 9 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the progression-free Survival 1 (PFS1)
Progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) is defined as the time interval from randomization until death or the disease progression observed in the first sequence of treatment in each arm, evaluated using Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Time frame: Expected duration of 3 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)
Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) is defined as the time interval from randomization until death or the disease progression is observed in the later sequence of treatment in each arm, evaluated using RECIST v1.1.
Time frame: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Disease control rate (DCR)
Disease control rate (DCR) is defined as percentage of patients with a best response that is not progressive disease (PD) (either complete response \[CR\], partial response \[PR\], or stable disease \[SD\]) during treatment. DCR will be assessed in each study arm.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Clinique Saint Luc
Bouge, Belgium
CH de l'Ardenne
Libramont, Belgium
CH Verviers
Verviers, Belgium
Hôpital Privé Pays de Savoie
Annemasse, France
Centre hospitalier d'Auxerre
Auxerre, France
Institut Sainte Catherine
Avignon, France
Centre Hospitalier de Bayeux
Bayeux, France
Centre François Baclesse
Caen, France
Infirmerie Protestante de Lyon
Caluire-et-Cuire, France
CH Cotentin
Cherbourg, France
...and 26 more locations
Time frame: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Objective response rate (ORR)
Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as percentage of patients with a best response being either complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\] during treatment. ORR will be assessed in each study arm.
Time frame: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Time-to-treatment failure 1 (TTF1)
Time-to-treatment failure 1 (TTF1) is defined as the time from randomization to treatment discontinuation for any reason (including disease progression, treatment toxicity, patient preference, or death) during the first sequence of treatment in each arm.
Time frame: Expected duration of 3 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Time-to-treatment failure 2 (TTF2)
Time-to-treatment failure 2 (TTF2) is defined as the time from randomization to treatment discontinuation for any reason (including disease progression, treatment toxicity, patient preference, or death) during the second sequence of treatment in each arm.
Time frame: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the health-related quality of life of cancer patients during treatment
Quality of life data using the patient reported outcomes, quality of life questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30) version 3.0 will be collected during the study. Developed by the EORTC, this self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials. The questionnaire includes five functional scales (physical, everyday activity, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a health/quality of life overall scale, and a number of additional elements assessing common symptoms (including dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as, the perceived financial impact of the disease. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Time frame: Expected 30 days after last study treatment administration, up to 5 years
To evaluate the performance status deterioration
The time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2 deterioration is defined as the time interval between randomization and the first documented ECOG PS ≥2 during the study.
Time frame: Expected 30 days after last study treatment administration, up to 5 years
To evaluate the safety (Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events) during treatment
Data concerning adverse events graded using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0 will be collected during the study.
Time frame: Expected 30 days after last study treatment administration, up to 5 years