To compare air Q versus ILMA intubation in obese adult paralyzed patient
Evaluate the process of endo-tracheal intubation through Air Q compared to through ILMA regarding number and duration of attempts, laryngeal view grade, time to removal of device over tube without dislodgement and any complication
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
80
Success of fiberoptic guided intubation throuhgh Air Q supraglottic airway device
Success of fiberoptic guided intubation throuhgh ILMA supraglottic airway device
Zagazig University
Zagazig, Egypt
success rate of tracheal intubation through each device.
success rate of tracheal intubation through each device is defined as end tidal carbon dioxide confirmed placement of TT within a maximum of 5 min tracheal intubation time
Time frame: Within a maximum of 5 minutes to confirm success of tracheal intubation through each supraglottic airway devices
Insertion time of supraglottic airway devices
Time necessary for insertion was measured from the time the face mask was taken away until the appearance of Co2 on the capnograph while supraglottic airway device in place
Time frame: It is about 13-19 second for insertion of supraglottic airway devices
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.