I-gel Versus Air-Q LMA for Pediatric Patients

Ain Shams University120 enrolled

Overview

This study targets to compare insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation using i-gel versus Air-Q LMA for pediatric patients undergoing short-duration surgical procedures.

The patient were divided into 2 groups. I gel group and Air Q group according to LMA type used to maintain airway ventilation. The patients were compared according to insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

120

Conditions

Easy Insertion, Complications Ans Suitability of i Gel and Air Q LMA

Interventions

LMA i gelOTHER

insertion of LMA for maintaining airway during anesthesia

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 3 YearsMax age: 10 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * ASA grade I-II * operative time of ≤60 minutes Exclusion Criteria: * age \>10 years * ASA grade ≥II * current or recently resolved upper respiratory tract infection * presence of oropharynx or laryngeal pathologies or congenital anomalies * pathologies inducing reflux or increasing the possibility of aspiration * allergy to anaesthetic or drugs to be used, renal, cardiac or hepatic diseases, or bronchial asthma

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University

Cairo, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Supraglottic device success rate

Fitness of LMA for ventilation

Time frame: 60 minutes

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.