The French Public Health Council recommended pneumococcal vaccination combined strategy for all immunocompromised patients in 2012. This strategy consisted in conjugated 13-valent pneumococcal (PCV13) injection followed 2 months later by polysaccharide 23-valent (PPV23) vaccine injection. In 2024, Health authorities changed guidelines to recommend one injection of PREVENAR20 instead of the 2-vaccine scheme general practitioners are usually in charge of this vaccination. Conjugated pneumococcal vaccine enhances the immunogenicity of the polysaccharide vaccine. Acute leukemia and lymphoma are treated with multiple courses of chemotherapy, impairing the immune system and potentially the response to vaccination. These patients are more at risk for developing pneumococcal invasive diseases than the general population. However, efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination is poorly documented in this setting. We assume that 65% of the patients are non-responders to double compared to 45% for PCV20PREVENAR20 vaccination, according to their anti-pneumococcal immunoglobulin G (Ig) titers and the opsonophagocytic activity (OPA). To assess the immunogenicity of the pneumococcal vaccination combined strategy in adult population of acute leukemia and lymphoma, we will measure anti-pneumococcal serotype-specific IgG titers and OPA at different time-points after completion of the combined vaccine strategy. The primary objective is to assess the immunogenicity of pneumococcal vaccination combined strategy at 3 months after the PCV13 injection (corresponding to 1 month after the end of the combined strategy in cohort A) using Ig G titers and OPA, compared to 3 months post PREVENAR20 (cohort B). At different time points (day 0, 4 weeks post PCV13, and 4 weeks, 3-6 months and 9-12 months post PPV23 and in day 0, 4 weeks post PREVENAR20 and 3 months, 5-8 months and 11-14 months post PREVENAR20, the immunological response to vaccination will be monitored using specific-serotype IgG titers, OPA, and total anti-pneumococcal Ig. We will determine predictive factors of non-response to vaccination by comparing demographic data, biological data and treatment received lymphoma patients. The tolerance and safety of the vaccination strategy will also be assessed in this specific hematological population.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
160
Cohort study A before modification of vaccination national guidelines
Health authorities changed guidelines to recommend one injection of PREVENAR20 instead of the 2-vaccine scheme general practitioners are usually in charge of this vaccination. Cohort study B
Chu Angers
Angers, France
RECRUITINGCHU Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
TERMINATEDCHU Limoges
Limoges, France
RECRUITINGChu Nantes
Nantes, France
TERMINATEDCh Perigueux
Périgueux, France
RECRUITINGCHU Poitiers
Poitiers, France
RECRUITINGCHU Tours
Tours, France
RECRUITINGProportion of patients having an immunological response
Proportion of patients having an immunological response to combined strategy at 4 weeks after the end of the combined strategy compared to proportion of patients having an immunologicalresponse at 3 months post PREVENAR20 injection. An immunological response to vaccination is defined by 7/10 tested serotypes responding to these 4 criteria: a serotype-specific IgG titer ≥ 1,3 μg/mL (WHO threshold), a two-fold increase of this IgG titer compare to baseline before vaccination, a serotype-specific OPA ≥1/8, and a four-fold increase of functional antibodies compare to baseline.
Time frame: 4 weeks after the end of the combined strategy for cohort study A and 3 months post injection for cohort study B
Proportion of patients having an ELISA serotype-specific IgG titer and a two-fold increase of this IgG titer
Proportion of patients having an ELISA serotype-specific IgG titer ≥ 1.3 μg/mL (WHO threshold) and a two-fold increase of this IgG titer compared to baseline at 4 weeks after the PCV13 or PREVENAR20 injection
Time frame: 4 weeks after injection
Proportion of patients having a sustainable response to vaccination
Proportion of patients having a sustainable response to vaccination defined by an ELISA serotype-specific IgG titer ≥ 1μg/mL (WHO threshold) and a two-fold increase of this IgG titer compared to baseline between 3-6 months after the PPV23 injection or 5-8 months post PREVENAR20.
Time frame: 3-6 months after the PPV23 injection or 5-8 months post PREVENAR20
Proportion of patients having a sustainable response to vaccination
Proportion of patients having a sustainable response to vaccination defined by the same criteria as the primary outcome and measured between 9-12 months after the PPV23 injection or 11-14 months post PREVENAR20.
Time frame: 9-12 months after the PPV23 injection or 11-14 months post PREVENAR20.
Proportion of responding patients having titers of IgG, IgG2, IgM, and IgA rising significantly
Proportion of responding patients having titers of IgG, IgG2, IgM, and IgA rising significantly at 4 weeks after PCV13 or PREVENAR20 injection, and 4 weeks, 3-6 months and 9-12 months after PPV23 injection versus respectively 3 months, 5-8 months and 11-14 months after PREVENAR20 injection. A significant increase is defined by a 4-fold increase of IgG and IgG2 titers, a 13-fold increase of IgA titers, and a 20-fold increase of IgM titers compared to baseline at inclusion.
Time frame: 4 weeks after PCV13 or PREVENAR20 injection, and 4 weeks, 3-6 months and 9-12 months after PPV23 injection versus respectively 3 months, 5-8 months and 11-14 months after PREVENAR20 injection.
Predictive factors for non-response to vaccination
To determine predictive factors for non-response to vaccination at 4 weeks, and 9-12 months after PPV23 versus respectively 3 months and 11-14 months after PREVENAR20 injection such as age, immune status, chemotherapy, immunotherapy.
Time frame: 4 weeks, and 9-12 months after PPV23 versus respectively 3 months and 11-14 months after PREVENAR20 injection
Local or general reactions to vaccination and invasive pneumococcal infections
Number of patients having local or general reactions to vaccination and number of invasive pneumococcal infections with a documented serotype considered as vaccination failure.
Time frame: 14 months
Concordance between the reference immuno-monitoring dosage and another kit of dosage
To assess the concordance between the reference immuno-monitoring dosage (WHO ELISA) and another kit of dosage (Vacczyme® Binding Site®).
Time frame: 14 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.